Search Results
Search for other papers by Giulia Vocino Trucco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marco Volante in
Google Scholar
PubMed
recognized based on the morphology and grade of differentiation: neuroendocrine tumors (NETs, also termed as carcinoid tumors in the thoracic location) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). In this binary framework, NETs correspond to well
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
ENETS Center of Excellence, Neuroendocrine Tumour (NET) Center, Rome, Italy
Search for other papers by Guido Rindi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ENETS Center of Excellence, Neuroendocrine Tumour (NET) Center, Rome, Italy
Search for other papers by Frediano Inzani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the poorly differentiated lesion, defined as neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). (A, B and C) NET G1 displays a trabecular/insular structure, in absence of necrosis, and is composed of epithelial cells with abundant cytoplasm, low degree of atypia, low, if
Search for other papers by Massimo Milione in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patrick Maisonneuve in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessio Pellegrinelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federica Grillo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luca Albarello in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paola Spaggiari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Vanoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giovanna Tagliabue in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eleonora Pisa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luca Messerini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Clinical Research Lab (CRAB), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Giovanni Centonze in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frediano Inzani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aldo Scarpa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mauro Papotti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marco Volante in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fausto Sessa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Fazio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Giancarlo Pruneri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guido Rindi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Enrico Solcia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano La Rosa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlo Capella in
Google Scholar
PubMed
; however, prognostic markers predictive of MANEC outcome have not been definitively validated to date. Whether prognostic markers of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), such as proliferation, CD117 expression and microsatellite
Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Andreas Venizelos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Halfdan Sorbye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Search for other papers by Hege Elvebakken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aurel Perren in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Inger Marie B Lothe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Couvelard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geir Olav Hjortland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Search for other papers by Anna Sundlöv in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johanna Svensson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harrish Garresori in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Kersten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
Search for other papers by Eva Hofsli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Sönke Detlefsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lene W Vestermark in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for other papers by Morten Ladekarl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizaveta Mitkina Tabaksblat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Stian Knappskog in
Google Scholar
PubMed
3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) ( WHO 2019 ). The molecular features of HG-GEP NENs are not well characterized, but some recent reports have shed new light on the landscape of somatic
Search for other papers by Himisha Beltran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesca Demichelis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
neuroendocrine carcinoma ( Beltran et al. 2011 , Bluemn et al. 2017 , Aggarwal et al. 2018 ). As new drugs enter the clinic for neuroendocrine prostate cancer, patient selection will be critical. Figure 1 Schematic of the lineage plasticity process
Search for other papers by Tim J Takkenkamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mathilde Jalving in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frederik J H Hoogwater in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Annemiek M E Walenkamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) ( Kim et al. 2017 ). Next to this, a study analysing gastric carcinomas found that 10% of these tumours are neuroendocrine malignant tumours and were reclassified as NECs ( Waldum et al. 1998 ). The incidence of
Department of Diabetology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Marc Diedisheim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Solène Dermine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Center for Rare Adrenal Diseases, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Anne Jouinot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amandine Septier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Sébastien Gaujoux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Bertrand Dousset in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guillaume Cadiot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Diabetology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Etienne Larger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Center for Rare Adrenal Diseases, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Jérôme Bertherat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raphael Scharfmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Benoit Terris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Romain Coriat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Center for Rare Adrenal Diseases, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Guillaume Assié in
Google Scholar
PubMed
–67) months. Patient’s characteristics are summarized in Table 1. 47% of DPNETs are non-functional, and 32% are insulinoma; 62% were classified as grade 1, 33% as grade 2, 3% as grade 3 and 2% as neuroendocrine carcinoma. Recurrence occurred in 24% of
Gastroenterology and Technologies for Health, Centre de Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052-CNRS UMR5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
Search for other papers by Laura Gerard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Céline Patte in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laurence Chardon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Service Central d’Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
Search for other papers by Valérie Hervieu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Léa Payen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marion Allio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claire Marx in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hugo Clermidy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alice Durand in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patrick Mehlen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julien Bollard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gilles Poncet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Colette Roche in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benjamin Gibert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Gastroenterology and Technologies for Health, Centre de Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052-CNRS UMR5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
Search for other papers by Thomas Walter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
separated in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs, or ‘carcinoid’ for lung NETs) and in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Despite chromogranin A (CgA) is the main established tissue and circulating marker for the management
Search for other papers by Luisella Righi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marco Volante in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ida Rapa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Veronica Tavaglione in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frediano Inzani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Pelosi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mauro Papotti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
(129 cases from Turin, 40 from Parma, and 49 from Milan) was collected, including 24 TCs with lymph node metastases at the time of the diagnosis (TC mets), 73 ACs with or without lymph node metastases, 60 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs
Search for other papers by James C Yao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jonathan Strosberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Fazio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianne E Pavel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emily Bergsland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Ruszniewski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniel M Halperin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daneng Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Salvatore Tafuto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nitya Raj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Campana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susumu Hijioka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Raderer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosine Guimbaud in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pablo Gajate in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Pusceddu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Albert Reising in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Evgeny Degtyarev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mark Shilkrut in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simantini Eddy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simron Singh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
years ( Yao et al. 2008 ). Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are comprised of well-differentiated NETs and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The World Health Organization classification reported four categories, based on tumor