Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for
- Author: Jens Pietzsch x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by Martin Ullrich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Technische Universität Dresden, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Josephine Liers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mirko Peitzsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anja Feldmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ralf Bergmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ulrich Sommer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Susan Richter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Internal Medicine III, Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Stefan R Bornstein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Radioimmunology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Universitäts Krebs Centrum (UCC), Tumorimmunology, Dresden, Germany
Technische Universität Dresden, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Michael Bachmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Dresden, Germany
Department of Internal Medicine III, Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Graeme Eisenhofer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian G Ziegler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Technische Universität Dresden, School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Jens Pietzsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Somatostatin receptor-targeting endoradiotherapy offers potential for treating metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, an approach likely to benefit from combination radiosensitization therapy. To provide reliable preclinical in vivo models of metastatic disease, this study characterized the metastatic spread of luciferase-expressing mouse pheochromocytoma (MPC) cells in mouse strains with different immunologic conditions. Bioluminescence imaging showed that, in contrast to subcutaneous non-metastatic engraftment of luciferase-expressing MPC cells in NMRI-nude mice, intravenous cell injection provided only suboptimal metastatic spread in both NMRI-nude mice and hairless SCID (SHO) mice. Treatment of NMRI-nude mice with anti-Asialo GM1 serum enhanced metastatic spread due to substantial depletion of natural killer (NK) cells. However, reproducible metastatic spread was only observed in NK cell-defective SCID/beige mice and in hairless immunocompetent SKH1 mice bearing disseminated or liver metastases, respectively. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry of urine samples showed that subcutaneous and metastasized tumor models exhibit comparable renal monoamine excretion profiles characterized by increasing urinary dopamine, 3-methoxytyramine, norepinephrine and normetanephrine. Metastases-related epinephrine and metanephrine were only detectable in SCID/beige mice. Positron emission tomography and immunohistochemistry revealed that all metastases maintained somatostatin receptor-specific radiotracer uptake and immunoreactivity, respectively. In conclusion, we demonstrate that intravenous injection of luciferase-expressing MPC cells into SCID/beige and SKH1 mice provides reproducible and clinically relevant spread of catecholamine-producing and somatostatin receptor-positive metastases. These standardized preclinical models allow for precise monitoring of disease progression and should facilitate further investigations on theranostic approaches against metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.
Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse, Dresden, Germany
Department of Experimental Diabetology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany
German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), München-Neuherberg, Germany
Search for other papers by Nicole Bechmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Institute of Physiology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Mats Leif Moskopp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Ullrich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
Search for other papers by Bruna Calsina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pål William Wallace in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susan Richter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Friedemann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katharina Langton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephanie M J Fliedner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Henri J L M Timmers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Svenja Nölting in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, UniviersitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Felix Beuschlein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Fassnacht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aleksander Prejbisz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karel Pacak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hans K Ghayee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan R Bornstein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Dieterich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, Mommsenstrasse, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Jens Pietzsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ben Wielockx in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
Search for other papers by Mercedes Robledo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Department of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Search for other papers by Nan Qin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Graeme Eisenhofer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Mutations that drive the stabilization of hypoxia inducible factor 2α (HIF2α) and downstream pseudohypoxic signaling are known to predispose to the development of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). However, any role of HIF2α in predisposition to metastatic disease remains unclear. To assess such a role we combined gene-manipulations in pheochromocytoma cell lines with retrospective analyses of patient data and gene expression profiling in tumor specimens. Among 425 patients with PPGLs identified with mutations in tumor-susceptibility genes, those with tumors due to activation of pseudohypoxic pathways had a higher frequency of metastatic disease than those with tumors due to activation of kinase-signaling pathways, even without inclusion of patients with mutations in SDHB (18.6% vs 4.3% in, P < 0.0001). Three out of nine (33%) patients with gain-of-function mutations in HIF2α had metastatic disease. In cell line studies, elevated expression of HIF2α enhanced cell proliferation and led to increased migration and invasion capacity. Moreover, HIF2α expression in HIF2α-deficient cells resulted in increased cell motility, diffuse cluster formation and emergence of pseudopodia indicating changes in cell adhesion and cytoskeletal remodeling. In a mouse liver metastasis model, Hif2a enhanced the metastatic load. Transcriptomics data revealed alterations in focal adhesion and extracellular matrix–receptor interactions in HIF2α-mutated PPGLs. Our translational findings demonstrate that HIF2α supports pro-metastatic behavior in PPGLs, though other factors remain critical for subsequent transition to metastasis. We identified LAMB1 and COL4A2 as new potential therapeutic targets for HIF2α-driven PPGLs. Identified HIF2α downstream targets might open a new therapeutic window for aggressive HIF2α-expressing tumors.
Search for other papers by Katharina Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ina Schütze in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sebastian Gulde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Nicole Bechmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susan Richter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jana Helm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Lauseker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julian Maurer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Astrid Reul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gerald Spoettl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Center of Genetics, Laboratoire National de Santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg
German Cancer Consortium, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Barbara Klink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Doreen William in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Knösel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juliane Friemel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michel Bihl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Achim Weber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Fankhauser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Schober in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Diana Vetter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martina Broglie Däppen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian G Ziegler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Ullrich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Jens Pietzsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan R Bornstein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Lottspeich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Matthias Kroiss in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Fassnacht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vera Ursula Julia Wenter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roland Ladurner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Constanze Hantel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Reincke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Graeme Eisenhofer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NET Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Ashley B Grossman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karel Pacak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich (USZ) and University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Felix Beuschlein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph J Auernhammer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalia S Pellegata in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich (USZ) and University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Svenja Nölting in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Aggressive pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are difficult to treat, and molecular targeting is being increasingly considered, but with variable results. This study investigates established and novel molecular-targeted drugs and chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of PPGLs in human primary cultures and murine cell line spheroids. In PPGLs from 33 patients, including 7 metastatic PPGLs, we identified germline or somatic driver mutations in 79% of cases, allowing us to assess potential differences in drug responsivity between pseudohypoxia-associated cluster 1-related (n = 10) and kinase signaling-associated cluster 2-related (n = 14) PPGL primary cultures. Single anti-cancer drugs were either more effective in cluster 1 (cabozantinib, selpercatinib, and 5-FU) or similarly effective in both clusters (everolimus, sunitinib, alpelisib, trametinib, niraparib, entinostat, gemcitabine, AR-A014418, and high-dose zoledronic acid). High-dose estrogen and low-dose zoledronic acid were the only single substances more effective in cluster 2. Neither cluster 1- nor cluster 2-related patient primary cultures responded to HIF-2a inhibitors, temozolomide, dabrafenib, or octreotide. We showed particular efficacy of targeted combination treatments (cabozantinib/everolimus, alpelisib/everolimus, alpelisib/trametinib) in both clusters, with higher efficacy of some targeted combinations in cluster 2 and overall synergistic effects (cabozantinib/everolimus, alpelisib/trametinib) or synergistic effects in cluster 2 (alpelisib/everolimus). Cabozantinib/everolimus combination therapy, gemcitabine, and high-dose zoledronic acid appear to be promising treatment options with particularly high efficacy in SDHB-mutant and metastatic tumors. In conclusion, only minor differences regarding drug responsivity were found between cluster 1 and cluster 2: some single anti-cancer drugs were more effective in cluster 1 and some targeted combination treatments were more effective in cluster 2.