Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for
- Author: G Eisenhofer x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by G Eisenhofer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T-T Huynh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Pacak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F M Brouwers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M M Walther in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by W M Linehan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P J Munson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Mannelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D S Goldstein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A G Elkahloun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) syndrome produce exclusively norepinephrine, whereas those in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2) produce epinephrine. This study examined the pathways activated in VHL-associated pheochromocytomas by comparing gene expression profiles in VHL and MEN 2 tumors in relationship to profiles in sporadic norepinephrine- and epinephrine-producing tumors. Larger and more distinct differences in gene expression among hereditary than sporadic tumors indicated the importance of the underlying mutation to gene expression profiles. Many of the genes over-expressed in VHL compared with MEN 2 tumors were clearly linked to the hypoxia-driven angiogenic pathways that are activated in VHL-associated tumorigenesis. Such genes included those for the glucose transporter, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), placental growth factor, angiopoietin 2, tie-1, VEGF receptor 2 and its coreceptor, neuropilin-1. Other up-regulated genes, such as connective tissue growth factor, cysteine-rich 61, matrix metalloproteinase 1, vascular endothelial cadherin, tenascin C, stanniocalcin 1, and cyclooxygenases 1 and 2 are known to be involved in VEGF-regulated angiogenesis. Shared differences in expression of subsets of genes in norepinephrine- versus epinephrine-producing hereditary and sporadic pheochromocytomas indicated other differences in gene expression that may underlie the biochemical phenotype. Over-expression of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor, HIF-2α, in norepinephrine-predominant sporadic and VHL tumors compared with epinephrine-producing tumors indicates that expression of this gene depends on the noradrenergic biochemical phenotype. The findings fit with the known expression of HIF-2α in norepinephrine-producing cells of the sympathetic nervous system and might explain both the development and noradrenergic biochemical phenotype of pheochromocytomas in VHL syndrome.
Search for other papers by Martin Ullrich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Technische Universität Dresden, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Josephine Liers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mirko Peitzsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anja Feldmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ralf Bergmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ulrich Sommer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Susan Richter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Internal Medicine III, Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Stefan R Bornstein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Radioimmunology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Universitäts Krebs Centrum (UCC), Tumorimmunology, Dresden, Germany
Technische Universität Dresden, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Michael Bachmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Dresden, Germany
Department of Internal Medicine III, Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Graeme Eisenhofer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian G Ziegler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Technische Universität Dresden, School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Jens Pietzsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Somatostatin receptor-targeting endoradiotherapy offers potential for treating metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, an approach likely to benefit from combination radiosensitization therapy. To provide reliable preclinical in vivo models of metastatic disease, this study characterized the metastatic spread of luciferase-expressing mouse pheochromocytoma (MPC) cells in mouse strains with different immunologic conditions. Bioluminescence imaging showed that, in contrast to subcutaneous non-metastatic engraftment of luciferase-expressing MPC cells in NMRI-nude mice, intravenous cell injection provided only suboptimal metastatic spread in both NMRI-nude mice and hairless SCID (SHO) mice. Treatment of NMRI-nude mice with anti-Asialo GM1 serum enhanced metastatic spread due to substantial depletion of natural killer (NK) cells. However, reproducible metastatic spread was only observed in NK cell-defective SCID/beige mice and in hairless immunocompetent SKH1 mice bearing disseminated or liver metastases, respectively. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry of urine samples showed that subcutaneous and metastasized tumor models exhibit comparable renal monoamine excretion profiles characterized by increasing urinary dopamine, 3-methoxytyramine, norepinephrine and normetanephrine. Metastases-related epinephrine and metanephrine were only detectable in SCID/beige mice. Positron emission tomography and immunohistochemistry revealed that all metastases maintained somatostatin receptor-specific radiotracer uptake and immunoreactivity, respectively. In conclusion, we demonstrate that intravenous injection of luciferase-expressing MPC cells into SCID/beige and SKH1 mice provides reproducible and clinically relevant spread of catecholamine-producing and somatostatin receptor-positive metastases. These standardized preclinical models allow for precise monitoring of disease progression and should facilitate further investigations on theranostic approaches against metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.
Search for other papers by F M Brouwers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E F Petricoin III in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Ksinantova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Breza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V Rajapakse in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Ross in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Johann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Mannelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B L Shulkin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Kvetnansky in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Eisenhofer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M M Walther in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B A Hitt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T P Conrads in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T D Veenstra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D P Mannion in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M R Wall in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G M Wolfe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V A Fusaro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L A Liotta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Pacak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Metastatic lesions occur in up to 36% of patients with pheochromocytoma. Currently there is no way to reliably detect or predict which patients are at risk for metastatic pheochromocytoma. Thus, the discovery of biomarkers that could distinguish patients with benign disease from those with metastatic disease would be of great clinical value. Using surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization protein chips combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry, we tested the hypothesis that pheochromocytoma pathologic states can be reflected as biomarker information within the low molecular weight (LMW) region of the serum proteome. LMW protein profiles were generated from the serum of 67 pheochromocytoma patients from four institutions and analyzed by two different bioinformatics approaches employing pattern recognition algorithms to determine if the LMW component of the circulatory proteome contains potentially useful discriminatory information. Both approaches were able to identify combinations of LMW molecules which could distinguish all metastatic from all benign pheochromocytomas in a separate blinded validation set.
In conclusion, for this study set low molecular mass biomarker information correlated with pheochromocytoma pathologic state using blinded validation. If confirmed in larger validation studies, efforts to identify the underlying diagnostic molecules by sequencing would be warranted. In the future, measurement of these biomarkers could be potentially used to improve the ability to identify patients with metastatic disease.
Search for other papers by Katharina Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ina Schütze in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sebastian Gulde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Nicole Bechmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susan Richter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jana Helm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Lauseker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julian Maurer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Astrid Reul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gerald Spoettl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Center of Genetics, Laboratoire National de Santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg
German Cancer Consortium, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Barbara Klink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Doreen William in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Knösel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juliane Friemel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michel Bihl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Achim Weber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Fankhauser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Schober in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Diana Vetter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martina Broglie Däppen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian G Ziegler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Ullrich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Jens Pietzsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan R Bornstein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Lottspeich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Matthias Kroiss in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Fassnacht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vera Ursula Julia Wenter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roland Ladurner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Constanze Hantel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Reincke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Search for other papers by Graeme Eisenhofer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NET Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Ashley B Grossman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karel Pacak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich (USZ) and University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Felix Beuschlein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph J Auernhammer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalia S Pellegata in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich (USZ) and University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Svenja Nölting in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Aggressive pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are difficult to treat, and molecular targeting is being increasingly considered, but with variable results. This study investigates established and novel molecular-targeted drugs and chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of PPGLs in human primary cultures and murine cell line spheroids. In PPGLs from 33 patients, including 7 metastatic PPGLs, we identified germline or somatic driver mutations in 79% of cases, allowing us to assess potential differences in drug responsivity between pseudohypoxia-associated cluster 1-related (n = 10) and kinase signaling-associated cluster 2-related (n = 14) PPGL primary cultures. Single anti-cancer drugs were either more effective in cluster 1 (cabozantinib, selpercatinib, and 5-FU) or similarly effective in both clusters (everolimus, sunitinib, alpelisib, trametinib, niraparib, entinostat, gemcitabine, AR-A014418, and high-dose zoledronic acid). High-dose estrogen and low-dose zoledronic acid were the only single substances more effective in cluster 2. Neither cluster 1- nor cluster 2-related patient primary cultures responded to HIF-2a inhibitors, temozolomide, dabrafenib, or octreotide. We showed particular efficacy of targeted combination treatments (cabozantinib/everolimus, alpelisib/everolimus, alpelisib/trametinib) in both clusters, with higher efficacy of some targeted combinations in cluster 2 and overall synergistic effects (cabozantinib/everolimus, alpelisib/trametinib) or synergistic effects in cluster 2 (alpelisib/everolimus). Cabozantinib/everolimus combination therapy, gemcitabine, and high-dose zoledronic acid appear to be promising treatment options with particularly high efficacy in SDHB-mutant and metastatic tumors. In conclusion, only minor differences regarding drug responsivity were found between cluster 1 and cluster 2: some single anti-cancer drugs were more effective in cluster 1 and some targeted combination treatments were more effective in cluster 2.