Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 6 of 6 items for
- Author: Halfdan Sorbye x
- Refine by access: All content x
Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Halfdan Sorbye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Search for other papers by Grace Kong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment for grade 1 and 2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with an increased uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI). Patients with metastatic high-grade (WHO G3) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NET G3 and NEC) represent a heterogeneous subgroup with poor prognosis and standard platinum-etoposide chemotherapy have limited therapeutic benefit. However, there is promising emerging evidence supporting the effectiveness of PRRT in SRI-positive G3 disease. A review search for studies reporting on PRRT in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms G3 was performed: four studies with more than ten cases were found. PRRT was mainly given as second- or third-line treatment in patients with progressive disease. Most patients had a pancreatic primary, 50% had well-differentiated tumors, and most had a Ki-67 <55%. Three studies showed similar results with promising response rates (31–41%) and disease control rates (69–78%). Progression-free survival (11–16 months) and survival (22–46 months) were best concerning patients with a Ki-67 <55%. Progression-free survival was 19 months in NET G3, 11 months for lowNEC (Ki-67 ≤55%) and 4 months for highNEC (Ki-67 >55%). PRRT should be considered for patients with increased uptake on SRI, both in gastroenteropancreatic NET G3 cases and as well as in NEC cases with a Ki-67 21–55%. PRRT for NEC with a Ki-67 >55% is less defined, but could be considered in highly selected cases after response to initial chemotherapy where all residual disease have high uptake on SRI. Dual tracer using 18F-FDG PET/CT and SRI provides important information for patient selection for PRRT in this heterogeneous complex high-grade disease.
Department of Oncology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
Search for other papers by Dimitrios Papantoniou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Malin Grönberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Espen Thiis-Evensen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Bergen, Deptartment of Clinical Medicine, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Halfdan Sorbye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Surgery, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
Search for other papers by Kalle Landerholm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Staffan Welin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eva Tiensuu Janson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (Si-NET) are often studied as a uniform group. Proliferation index Ki-67 influences prognosis and determines tumour grade. We hypothesized that Si-NET grade 2 (G2) tumours, which have a higher Ki-67 than G1 tumours, might benefit less from established treatments for metastatic disease. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 212 patients with metastatic Si-NET G2 treated in two Swedish hospitals during 20 years (2000–2019). Median cancer-specific survival on first-line somatostatin analogues (SSA) was 77 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months when SSA was given as monotherapy and 19 months for all patients receiving first-line SSA. PFS after SSA dose escalation was 6 months in patients with radiological progression. Treatment efficacies of SSA and peptide receptor radionuclide treatment (PRRT) were studied separately in patients with Ki-67 of 3–5%, 5–10% and 10–20%. For SSA, PFS was significantly shorter at higher Ki-67 levels (31, 18 and 10 months, respectively), while there was only a minor difference in PFS for PRRT (29, 25 and 25 months). Median PFS for sequential treatment with interferon-alpha (IFNα), everolimus and chemotherapy was 6, 5 and 9 months. IFNα seemed to be effective in tumours with low somatostatin–receptor expression. In conclusion, established treatments appeared effective in Si-NET G2, despite their higher proliferation index compared to G1 tumours. However, efficacy of SSA but not PRRT was reduced at higher Ki-67 levels. SSA dose escalation provided limited disease stabilization.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cluster for Molecular Imaging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Esben Andreas Carlsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Fazio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dan Granberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chiara Maria Grana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wouter T Zandee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jaroslaw Cwikla in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin A Walter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Sandor Oturai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anja Rinke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew Weaver in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Frilling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Gritti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Kirstine Arveschoug in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amichay Meirovitz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Departments of Surgical Gastroenterology and Clinical Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Ulrich Knigge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Halfdan Sorbye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors grade 1–2 (G1–G2). However, its possible benefit in high-grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN G3) is largely unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the benefits and side effects of PRRT in patients with GEP NEN G3. We performed a retrospective cohort study at 12 centers to assess the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT in patients with GEP NEN G3. Outcomes were response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. We included 149 patients (primary tumor: pancreatic n = 89, gastrointestinal n = 34, unknown n = 26). PRRT was first-line (n = 30), second-line (n = 62) or later-line treatment (n = 57). Of 114 patients evaluated, 1% had complete response, 41% partial response, 38% stable disease and 20% progressive disease. Of 104 patients with documented progressive disease before PRRT, disease control rate was 69%. The total cohort had median PFS of 14 months and OS of 29 months. Ki-67 21–54% (n = 125) vs Ki-67 ≥55% (n = 23): PFS 16 vs 6 months (P < 0.001) and OS 31 vs 9 months (P < 0.001). Well (n = 60) vs poorly differentiated NEN (n = 62): PFS 19 vs 8 months (P < 0.001) and OS 44 vs 19 months (P < 0.001). Grade 3–4 hematological or renal toxicity occurred in 17% of patients. This large multicenter cohort of patients with GEP NEN G3 treated with PRRT demonstrates promising response rates, disease control rates, PFS and OS as well as toxicity in patients with mainly progressive disease. Based on these results, PRRT may be considered for patients with GEP NEN G3.
Search for other papers by Jan P Dumanski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chiara Rasi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peyman Björklund in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hanna Davies in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Abir S Ali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Malin Grönberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Staffan Welin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Halfdan Sorbye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Henning Grønbæk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Janet L Cunningham in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lars A Forsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lars Lind in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erik Ingelsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Stålberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Per Hellman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eva Tiensuu Janson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The genetics behind predisposition to small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) is largely unknown, but there is growing awareness of a familial form of the disease. We aimed to identify germline mutations involved in the carcinogenesis of SI-NETs. The strategy included next-generation sequencing of exome- and/or whole-genome of blood DNA, and in selected cases, tumor DNA, from 24 patients from 15 families with the history of SI-NETs. We identified seven candidate mutations in six genes that were further studied using 215 sporadic SI-NET patients. The result was compared with the frequency of the candidate mutations in three control cohorts with a total of 35,688 subjects. A heterozygous variant causing an amino acid substitution p.(Gly396Asp) in the MutY DNA glycosylase gene (MUTYH) was significantly enriched in SI-NET patients (minor allele frequencies 0.013 and 0.003 for patients and controls respectively) and resulted in odds ratio of 5.09 (95% confidence interval 1.56–14.74; P value = 0.0038). We also found a statistically significant difference in age at diagnosis between familial and sporadic SI-NETs. MUTYH is involved in the protection of DNA from mutations caused by oxidative stress. The inactivation of this gene leads to specific increase of G:C- > T:A transversions in DNA sequence and has been shown to cause various cancers in humans and experimental animals. Our results suggest that p.(Gly396Asp) in MUTYH, and potentially other mutations in additional members of the same DNA excision-repair pathway (such as the OGG1 gene) might be involved in driving the tumorigenesis leading to familial and sporadic SI-NETs.
Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Andreas Venizelos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Halfdan Sorbye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Search for other papers by Hege Elvebakken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aurel Perren in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Inger Marie B Lothe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Couvelard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geir Olav Hjortland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Search for other papers by Anna Sundlöv in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johanna Svensson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harrish Garresori in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Kersten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
Search for other papers by Eva Hofsli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Sönke Detlefsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lene W Vestermark in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for other papers by Morten Ladekarl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizaveta Mitkina Tabaksblat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Stian Knappskog in
Google Scholar
PubMed
High-grade gastroenteropancreatic (HG-GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are highly aggressive cancers. The molecular etiology of these tumors remains unclear, and the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in patients with HG-GEP NENs is unknown. We assessed sequencing data of 360 cancer genes in normal tissue from 240 patients with HG-GEP NENs; 198 patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and 42 with grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3). Applying strict criteria, we identified pathogenic germline variants and compared the frequency with previously reported data from 33 different cancer types. We found a recurrent MYOC variant in three patients and a recurrent MUTYH variant in two patients, indicating that these genes may be important underlying risk factors for HG-GEP NENs when mutated. Further, germline variants were found in canonical tumor-suppressor genes, such as TP53, RB1, BRIP1 and BAP1. Overall, we found that 4.5% of patients with NEC and 9.5% of patients with NET G3 carry germline pathogenic or highly likely pathogenic variants. Applying identical criteria for variant classification in silico to mined data from 33 other cancer types, the median percentage of patients carrying pathogenic or highly likely pathogenic variants was 3.4% (range: 0–17%). The patients with NEC and pathogenic germline variants had a median overall survival of 9 months, similar to what is generally expected for metastatic GEP NECs. A patient with NET G3 and pathogenic MUTYH variant had much shorter overall survival than expected. The fraction of HG-GEP NENs with germline pathogenic variants is relatively high, but still <10%, meaning that that germline mutations cannot be the major underlying cause of HG-GEP NENs.
Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Andreas Venizelos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Search for other papers by Hege Elvebakken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aurel Perren in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Oleksii Nikolaienko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Wei Deng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Inger Marie B Lothe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Couvelard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geir Olav Hjortland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Search for other papers by Anna Sundlöv in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johanna Svensson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harrish Garresori in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Kersten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, St.Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
Search for other papers by Eva Hofsli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Sönke Detlefsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Merete Krogh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Halfdan Sorbye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Stian Knappskog in
Google Scholar
PubMed
High-grade (HG) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare but have a very poor prognosis and represent a severely understudied class of tumours. Molecular data for HG GEP-NEN are limited, and treatment strategies for the carcinoma subgroup (HG GEP-NEC) are extrapolated from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). After pathological re-evaluation, we analysed DNA from tumours and matched blood samples from 181 HG GEP-NEN patients; 152 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and 29 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3). Based on the sequencing of 360 cancer-related genes, we assessed mutations and copy number alterations (CNA). For NEC, frequently mutated genes were TP53 (64%), APC (28%), KRAS (22%) and BRAF (20%). RB1 was only mutated in 14%, but CNAs affecting RB1 were seen in 34%. Other frequent copy number losses were ARID1A (35%), ESR1 (25%) and ATM (31%). Frequent amplifications/gains were found in MYC (51%) and KDM5A (45%). While these molecular features had limited similarities with SCLC, we found potentially targetable alterations in 66% of the NEC samples. Mutations and CNA varied according to primary tumour site with BRAF mutations mainly seen in colon (49%), and FBXW7 mutations mainly seen in rectal cancers (25%). Eight out of 152 (5.3%) NEC were microsatellite instable (MSI). NET G3 had frequent mutations in MEN1 (21%), ATRX (17%), DAXX, SETD2 and TP53 (each 14%). We show molecular differences in HG GEP-NEN, related to morphological differentiation and site of origin. Limited similarities to SCLC and a high fraction of targetable alterations indicate a high potential for better-personalized treatments.