Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: J Capdevila x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
E Baudin Endocrine Oncology Unit, Imaging Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Search for other papers by E Baudin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J Capdevila Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB Quirón-Teknon, Barcelona, Spain

Search for other papers by J Capdevila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D Hörsch ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany

Search for other papers by D Hörsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S Singh Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook HSC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by S Singh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M E Caplin Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK

Search for other papers by M E Caplin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E M Wolin Division of Hematology and Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

Search for other papers by E M Wolin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W Buikhuisen Department of Thorax Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by W Buikhuisen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M Raderer Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Search for other papers by M Raderer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E Dansin Thoracic Oncology Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France

Search for other papers by E Dansin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C Grohe Department of Respiratory Diseases, Evangelische Lungenklinik, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by C Grohe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D Ferone Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genova, Genova, Italy

Search for other papers by D Ferone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A Houchard Data and Insights Generation and Strategy, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France

Search for other papers by A Houchard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
X-M Truong-Thanh Medical Affairs, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France

Search for other papers by X-M Truong-Thanh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D Reidy-Lagunes Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA

Search for other papers by D Reidy-Lagunes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
the SPINET Study Group
Search for other papers by the SPINET Study Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
the SPINET Study Group

Prospective data are lacking on early somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (BP-NETs; typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids (TCs and ACs)). SPINET (EudraCT: 2015-004992-62; NCT02683941) was a phase III, double-blind study of lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN; 120 mg every 28 days) plus best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo plus BSC, with an optional open-label treatment phase (LAN plus BSC). Patients had metastatic/unresectable, somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive TCs or ACs. Recruitment was stopped early owing to slow accrual; eligible patients from the double-blind phase transitioned to open-label LAN. The adapted primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) during either phase for patients receiving LAN. Seventy-seven patients were randomized (LAN, n = 51 (TCs, n = 29; ACs, n = 22); placebo, n = 26 (TCs, n = 16; ACs, n = 10)). Median (95% CI) PFS during double-blind and open-label phases in patients receiving LAN was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months overall (primary endpoint), 21.9 (12.8, not calculable (NC)) months in TCs, and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) months in ACs. During double-blind treatment, median (95% CI) PFS was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months for LAN vs 13.6 (8.3; NC) months for placebo (not significant); corresponding values were 21.9 (13.8; NC) and 13.9 (13.4; NC) months, respectively, in TCs and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) and 11.0 (2.8; 16.9) months, respectively, in ACs. Patients’ quality of life did not deteriorate and LAN was well tolerated. Although recruitment stopped early and the predefined sample size was not met, SPINET is the largest prospective study to date of SSA therapy in SSTR-positive TCs and ACs and suggests clinical benefit in TCs.

Open access
Marcia S Brose Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for other papers by Marcia S Brose in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jaume Capdevila Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Tumor Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

Search for other papers by Jaume Capdevila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rossella Elisei Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Search for other papers by Rossella Elisei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lars Bastholt Department of Clinical Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Search for other papers by Lars Bastholt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dagmar Führer-Sakel Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

Search for other papers by Dagmar Führer-Sakel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sophie Leboulleux Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Nutrition and Therapeutic Education, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneve, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Sophie Leboulleux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Iwao Sugitani Department of Endocrine Surgery, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Search for other papers by Iwao Sugitani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthew H Taylor Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA

Search for other papers by Matthew H Taylor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zhuoying Wang Department of Head Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
Department of Head Neck Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Zhuoying Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lori J Wirth Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for other papers by Lori J Wirth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Francis P Worden Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Search for other papers by Francis P Worden in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John Bernard Sanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Search for other papers by John Bernard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paolo Caferra Sanofi, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Search for other papers by Paolo Caferra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Raffaella M Colzani Sanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Search for other papers by Raffaella M Colzani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Shiguang Liu Sanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Search for other papers by Shiguang Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Martin Schlumberger Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France

Search for other papers by Martin Schlumberger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The VERIFY study aimed to determine the efficacy of vandetanib in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) that is either locally advanced or metastatic and refractory to radioiodine (RAI) therapy. Specifically, VERIFY is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase III trial aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of vandetanib in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic RAI-refractory DTC with documented progression (NCT01876784). Patients were randomized 1:1 to vandetanib or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included best objective response rate, overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. Patients continued to receive randomized treatment until disease progression or for as long as they were receiving clinical benefit unless criteria for treatment discontinuation were met. Following randomization, 117 patients received vandetanib, and 118 patients received a placebo. Median PFS was 10.0 months in the vandetanib group and 5.7 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.55–1.03; P = 0.080). OS was not significantly different between treatment arms. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) of grade ≥3 were reported in 55.6% of patients in the vandetanib arm and 25.4% in the placebo arm. Thirty-three deaths (28.2%; one related to study treatment) occurred in the vandetanib arm compared with 16 deaths (13.6%; two related to treatment) in the placebo arm. No statistically significant improvement was observed in PFS in treatment versus placebo in patients with locally advanced or metastatic, RAI-refractory DTC. Moreover, active treatment was associated with more adverse events and more deaths than placebo, though the difference in OS was not statistically significant.

Open access