Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for
- Author: María Isabel García Gómez-Muriel x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by Louis de Mestier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angela Lamarca in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jorge Hernando in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Wouter Zandee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Teresa Alonso-Gordoa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marine Perrier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Annemiek ME Walenkamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bipasha Chakrabarty in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefania Landolfi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marie-Louise F Van Velthuysen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gursah Kats-Ugurlu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alejandra Caminoa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maxime Ronot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Prakash Manoharan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alejandro Garcia-Alvarez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tessa Brabander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by María Isabel García Gómez-Muriel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guillaume Cadiot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Couvelard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jaume Capdevila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianne E Pavel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jérôme Cros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
There is no standardized treatment for grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs). We aimed to describe the treatments received in patients with advanced G3 NETs and compare their efficacy. Patients with advanced digestive G3 NETs treated between 2010 and 2018 in seven expert centers were retrospectively studied. Pathological samples were centrally reviewed, and radiological data were locally reviewed. We analyzed RECIST-defined objective response (OR), tumor growth rate (TGR) and progression-free survival (PFS) obtained with first- (L1) or second-line (L2) treatments. We included 74 patients with advanced G3 NETs, mostly from the duodenal or pancreatic origin (71.6%), with median Ki-67 of 30%. The 126 treatments (L1 = 74; L2 = 52) included alkylating-based (n = 32), etoposide-platinum (n = 22) or adenocarcinoma-like (n = 20) chemotherapy, somatostatin analogs (n = 21), targeted therapies (n = 22) and liver-directed therapies (n = 7). Alkylating-based chemotherapy achieved the highest OR rate (37.9%) compared to other treatments (multivariable OR 4.22, 95% CI (1.5–12.2); P = 0.008). Adenocarcinoma-like and alkylating-based chemotherapies showed the highest reductions in 3-month TGR (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). The longest median PFS was obtained with adenocarcinoma-like chemotherapy (16.5 months (9.0–24.0)) and targeted therapies (12.0 months (8.2–15.8)), while the shortest PFS was observed with somatostatin analogs (6.2 months (3.8–8.5)) and etoposide-platinum chemotherapy (7.2 months (5.2–9.1)). Etoposide-platinum CT achieved shorter PFS than adenocarcinoma-like (multivariable HR 3.69 (1.61–8.44), P = 0.002) and alkylating-based chemotherapies (multivariable HR 1.95 (1.01–3.78), P = 0.049). Overall, adenocarcinoma-like and alkylating-based chemotherapies may be the most effective treatments for patients with advanced G3 NETs regarding OR and PFS. Etoposide-platinum chemotherapy has poor efficacy in this setting.