Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for
- Author: Nitya Raj x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by Nitya Raj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Youyun Zheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Haley Hauser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joanne Chou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johnathan Rafailov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jad Bou-Ayache in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Sawan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jamie Chaft in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jennifer Chan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kimberly Perez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charles Rudin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Tang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Diane Reidy-Lagunes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus is an established therapy for well-differentiated (WD) foregut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Pre-clinical data demonstrates a potential synergistic role for cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition and everolimus to treat this disease. In this phase II multicenter study, patients with advanced foregut WDNETs received combination ribociclib and everolimus until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The first 12 patients received ribociclib 300 mg three weeks in a row with a 1 week break and everolimus 2.5 mg daily (recommended phase II dose). Due to unexpected hematologic and infectious toxicities, the trial was put on hold, modified, and an additional 9 patients received ribociclib 200 mg and everolimus 2.5 mg daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Archived pre-treatment tumor was profiled by next-generation sequencing to evaluate for genomic markers of drug response. Twenty-one patients were treated (median age, 56; range, 24 to 77). The study did not meet the pre-specified criteria to advance to stage two. No patients experienced an objective response. Thirteen patients (62%) experienced stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 2.8 months to not reached). Eleven of the first 12 patients (92%) developed grade 2 or more myelosuppression. Ten patients (84%) experienced treatment interruption and 8 patients (67%) required dose reduction. Genetic testing in archival tumor tissue samples failed to identify a predictive biomarker of disease stabilization. The combination of ribociclib and everolimus had insufficient activity to warrant further investigation in foregut WDNETs.
Search for other papers by Darren Cowzer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ronak H Shah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joanne F Chou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ritika Kundra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sippy Punn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Fiedler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by April DeMore in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marinela Capanu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathology and laboratory medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
Search for other papers by Michael F Berger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
Search for other papers by Diane Reidy-Lagunes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
Search for other papers by Nitya Raj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
In advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNEN), there are little data detailing the frequency of genetic alterations identified in cell free DNA (cfDNA), plasma–tissue concordance of detected alterations, and clinical utility of cfDNA. Patients with metastatic PanNENs underwent cfDNA collection in routine practice. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cfDNA and matched tissue when available was performed. Clinical actionability of variants was annotated by OncoKB. Thirty-two cfDNA samples were analyzed from 25 patients, the majority who had well-differentiated intermediate grade disease (13/25; 52%). Genomic alterations were detected in 68% of patients and in 66% of all cfDNA samples. The most frequently altered genes were DAXX (28%), TSC2 (24%), MEN1 (24%), ARID1B (20%), ARID1A (12%), and ATRX (12%). Twenty-three out of 25 (92%) patients underwent tumor tissue NGS. Tissue–plasma concordance for select genes was as follows:DAXX (95.7%), ARID1A (91.1%), ATRX (87%), TSC2 (82.6%), MEN1 (69.6%). Potentially actionable alterations were identified in cfDNA of 8 patients, including TSC2 (4; level 3b), ATM (1; level 3b), ARID1A (2; level 4), and KRAS (1; level 4). An ETV6:NTRK fusion detected in tumor tissue was treated with larotrectinib; at progression, sequencing of cfDNA identified an NTRK3 G623R alteration as the acquired mechanism of resistance; the patient enrolled in a clinical trial of a second-generation TRK inhibitor with clinical benefit. In metastatic PanNENs, cfDNA-based NGS identified tumor-associated mutations in 66% of plasma samples with a high level of plasma-tissue agreement in PanNEN-associated genes. Clonal evolution, actionable alterations, and resistance mechanisms were detected through circulating cfDNA genotyping.
Search for other papers by Jennifer R Eads in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thorvardur R Halfdanarson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tim Asmis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew M Bellizzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emily K Bergsland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arvind Dasari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ghassan El-Haddad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Frumovitz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joshua Meyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erik Mittra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sten Myrehaug in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Nakakura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nitya Raj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Heloisa P Soares in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Brian Untch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Namrata Vijayvergia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jennifer A Chan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.
Search for other papers by James C Yao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jonathan Strosberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Fazio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianne E Pavel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emily Bergsland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Ruszniewski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniel M Halperin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daneng Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Salvatore Tafuto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nitya Raj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Campana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susumu Hijioka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Raderer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosine Guimbaud in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pablo Gajate in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Pusceddu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Albert Reising in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Evgeny Degtyarev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mark Shilkrut in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simantini Eddy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simron Singh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Spartalizumab, a humanized anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) MAB, was evaluated in patients with well-differentiated metastatic grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC). In this phase II, multicenter, single-arm study, patients received spartalizumab 400 mg every 4 weeks until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was confirmed overall response rate (ORR) according to blinded independent review committee using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1. The study enrolled 95 patients in the NET group (30, 32 and 33 in the thoracic, gastrointestinal, and pancreatic cohorts, respectively), and 21 patients in the GEP-NEC group. The ORR was 7.4% (95% CI: 3.0, 14.6) in the NET group (thoracic, 16.7%; gastrointestinal, 3.1%; pancreatic, 3.0%), which was below the predefined success criterion of ≥10%, and 4.8% (95% CI: 0.1, 23.8) in the GEP-NEC group. In the NET and GEP-NEC groups, the 12-month progression-free survival was 19.5 and 0%, respectively, and the 12-month overall survival was 73.5 and 19.1%, respectively. The ORR was higher in patients with ≥1% PD-L1 expression in immune/tumor cells or ≥1% CD8+ cells at baseline. The most common adverse events considered as spartalizumab-related included fatigue (29.5%) and nausea (10.5%) in the NET group, and increased aspartate and alanine aminotransferases (each 14.3%) in the GEP-NEC group. The efficacy of spartalizumab was limited in this heterogeneous and heavily pre-treated population; however, the results in the thoracic cohort are encouraging and warrants further investigation. Adverse events were manageable and consistent with previous experience.