Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 7 of 7 items for
- Author: Philippe Ruszniewski x
- Refine by access: All content x
Department of Clinical Medicine and Gastroenterology, Service de Gastroentérologie, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, INSERM U773, Service de Radiologie, Service d'Oncologie Bichat-Beaujon, St James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland
Search for other papers by Dermot O'Toole in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine and Gastroenterology, Service de Gastroentérologie, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, INSERM U773, Service de Radiologie, Service d'Oncologie Bichat-Beaujon, St James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland
Search for other papers by Anne Couvelard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vinciane Rebours in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Magali Zappa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olivia Hentic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pascal Hammel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Levy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine and Gastroenterology, Service de Gastroentérologie, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, INSERM U773, Service de Radiologie, Service d'Oncologie Bichat-Beaujon, St James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland
Search for other papers by Pierre Bedossa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Raymond in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Ruszniewski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Response rates to cytotoxics in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) vary; recent trials demonstrated lack of objective response rates in up to 70% of patients. Identification of predictive therapeutic biomarkers would be beneficial in the treatment of GEP. Selected markers with known or suspected capability of predicting response to cytotoxics or prognosis (Ki-67, p53, multidrug resistance protein-1 (MDR1), Akt, thymidylate synthase (TS), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), CA9, cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1, mismatch repair gene – human mutL homolog 1 (hLMH1), and Bcl-2) were analyzed using immunohistochemisrtry in 60 treatment-naive patients receiving chemotherapy (n=46) or chemoembolization (n=14) for inoperable advanced and/or metastatic GEP and correlated with prognosis (survival and response rates). Therapy included systemic chemotherapy with streptozotocin (n=28), doxorubicin (n=14), 5-fluorouracil (n=18), and etoposide/cisplatinum (n=16), or chemoembolization (streptozotocin, 9; doxorubicin, 5). Factors associated with overall survival in the entire cohort were Ki-67, P<0.001; tumor grade, P<0.001; tumor differentiation, P<0.001; CA9, P=0.004; Akt, P=0.01; HIF-1, P<0.001; p53, P<0.0001; and hMLH1, P=0.005. Markers associated with treatment response included overall group: Akt and PTEN (P=0.05 and 0.05 respectively); streptozotocin: Akt (P=0.07), TS (P=0.02), and PTEN (P=0.017); doxorubicin: Ki-67 (P=0.05), Akt (P=0.06), and CA9 (P=0.02). At multivariate analysis, Akt was significantly associated with a nonresponse to therapy (objective response (OR): 0.2 (0.05–0.8)). For patients receiving only systemic chemotherapy (n=46), PTEN (0.04) and hLMH1 (0.03) were correlated with treatment response and for individual molecules were streptozotocin: PTEN (P=0.008) and hLMH1 (0.07); doxorubicin: Akt (P=0.09), CA9 (P=0.09), and hLMH1 (P=0.09). These results demonstrate a number of new prognostic biomarkers in GEP-NET, and in addition, response to chemotherapy was correlated with a simple panel of selected markers (such as CA9, Akt, PTEN, TS, and hLMH1).
Search for other papers by Bertrand Brieau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olivia Hentic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachida Lebtahi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maxime Palazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Makrem Ben Reguiga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vinciane Rebours in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frederique Maire in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pascal Hammel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Ruszniewski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre Fenaux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jonathan R Strosberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by James C Yao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emilio Bajetta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mounir Aout in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bert Bakker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John D Hainsworth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe B Ruszniewski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Van Cutsem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kjell Öberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianne E Pavel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Somatostatin analogues (SSA) have demonstrated antiproliferative activity in addition to efficacy for carcinoid symptom control in functional neuroendocrine tumors (NET). A post hoc analysis of the placebo arm of the RAD001 In Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors-2 (RADIANT-2) study was conducted to assess the efficacy of octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Out of 213 patients randomized to placebo plus octreotide LAR in RADIANT-2, 196 patients with foregut, midgut, or hindgut NET were considered for present analysis. Of these, 41 patients were SSA-treatment naïve and 155 had received SSA therapy before study entry. For SSA-naïve patients, median PFS by adjudicated central review was 13.6 (95% CI 8.2–22.7) months. For SSA-naïve patients with midgut NET (n=24), median PFS was 22.2 (95% CI 8.3–29.5) months. For patients who had received SSA previously, the median PFS was 11.1 (95% CI 8.4–14.3) months. Among the SSA-pretreated patients who had midgut NET (n=119), the median PFS was 12.0 (95% CI 8.4–19.3) months. Median OS was 35.8 (95% CI 32.5–48.9) months for patients in the placebo plus octreotide LAR arm; 50.6 (36.4 – not reached) months for SSA-naïve patients and 33.5 (95% CI 27.5–44.7) months for those who had received prior SSA. This post hoc analysis of the placebo arm of the large phase 3 RADIANT-2 study provides data on PFS and OS among patients with progressive NET treated with octreotide therapy.
Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche sur l’Inflammation, INSERM, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Ophélie De Rycke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Walter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marine Perrier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olivia Hentic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Catherine Lombard-Bohas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Romain Coriat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guillaume Cadiot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Bichat/Beaujon University Hospital, Paris/Clichy, France
Search for other papers by Anne Couvelard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche sur l’Inflammation, INSERM, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Philippe Ruszniewski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Bichat/Beaujon University Hospital, Paris/Clichy, France
Search for other papers by Jérôme Cros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche sur l’Inflammation, INSERM, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Louis de Mestier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
A rechallenge is common after the initial efficacy of alkylating-based chemotherapy (ALK) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET). High MGMT expression seems associated with a lower response to ALK. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ALK rechallenge in PanNET, and to assess the evolution of MGMT expression under ALK. All consecutive patients with advanced PanNETs who received initial ALK (achieving tumor control) followed by a pause of > 3 months, then an ALK rechallenge (ALK2) upon progression were retrospectively studied (cohort A). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival under ALK2 (PFS2). The MGMT expression was retrospectively assessed by immunohistochemistry (H-score) in consecutive PanNET surgically resected following ALK (cohort B). We found that Cohort A included 62 patients (median Ki67 8%), for whom ALK1 followed by a pause achieved an objective response rate of 55% and a PFS1 of 23.7 months (95% IC, 19.8–27.6). ALK2 achieved no objective response and stability in 62% of patients. The median PFS2 was 9.2 months (IC 95% 7.1–11.3). At multivariable analysis, a hormonal syndrome (P = 0.032) and a pause longer than 12 months (P = 0.041) were associated with a longer PFS2. In cohort B (17 patients), the median MGMT H-score increased from 45 (IQR 18–105) before ALK to 100 (IQR 56–180) after ALK (P = 0.003). We conclude that after the initial efficacy of ALK treatment, a pause followed by ALK rechallenge might be appropriate to prolong tumor control, improve quality of life and limit long-term adverse events. Increased MGMT expression under ALK might explain the low efficacy of ALK rechallenge.
Centre of Research on Inflammation, INSERM U1149, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Louis de Mestier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Bichat/Beaujon University Hospitals (APHP), and Université de Paris, Clichy/Paris, France
Search for other papers by Anne Couvelard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anela Blazevic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olivia Hentic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre of Research on Inflammation, INSERM U1149, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Vinciane Rebours in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Bichat/Beaujon University Hospitals (APHP), and Université de Paris, Clichy/Paris, France
Search for other papers by Valérie Paradis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre of Research on Inflammation, INSERM U1149, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Philippe Ruszniewski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leo J Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Bichat/Beaujon University Hospitals (APHP), and Université de Paris, Clichy/Paris, France
Search for other papers by Jérôme Cros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The efficacy of alkylating agents (temozolomide, dacarbazine, streptozotocin) in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been well documented, especially in pancreatic NETs. Alkylating agents transfer methyl adducts on DNA bases. Among them, O6-methylguanine accounts for many of their cytotoxic effects and can be repaired by the O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT). However, whether the tumor MGMT status could be a reliable biomarker of efficacy of alkylating agents in NETs is still a matter of debate. Herein, we sought to provide a critical appraisal of the role of the MGMT status in NETs. After reviewing the molecular mechanisms of repair of DNA damage induced by alkylating agents, we aimed to comprehensively review the methods of determination of the MGMT status and its impact on prognosis, prediction of objective response and progression-free survival in patients with advanced digestive NETs treated by alkylating agents. About half of pancreatic NETs are MGMT-deficient, as determined by impaired tumor MGMT expression or by MGMT promoter methylation. Overall, while published studies are heterogeneous and mostly limited in size, they advocate that MGMT deficiency may be a relevant biomarker for increased objective response rate, prolonged progression-fee survival and overall survival in patients with advanced NETs treated by alkylating agents. While these data require confirmation in prospective controlled studies, future research should focus on the standardization of MGMT status assessment. Additional mechanisms of repair of DNA damages induced by alkylating agents should be explored in order to identify biomarkers complementary to MGMT and targets for potential antitumor synergy, such as PARP.
Search for other papers by Martyn E Caplin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianne Pavel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jarosław B Ćwikła in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexandria T Phan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Raderer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eva Sedláčková in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guillaume Cadiot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Edward M Wolin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jaume Capdevila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lucy Wall in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guido Rindi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alison Langley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Séverine Martinez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Edda Gomez-Panzani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Royal Free Hospital, Charité University Medicine Berlin, University of Warmia and Mazury, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, University Hospital, Department of Oncology of the First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital, Robert‐Debré Hospital, Markey Cancer Center, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Western General Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Ipsen, Ipsen, Beaujon Hospital, Paris Diderot University, London, UK
Search for other papers by Philippe Ruszniewski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by on behalf of the CLARINET Investigators in
Google Scholar
PubMed
In the CLARINET study, lanreotide Autogel (depot in USA) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic pancreatic/intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). We report long-term safety and additional efficacy data from the open-label extension (OLE). Patients with metastatic grade 1/2 (Ki-67 ≤10%) non-functioning NET and documented baseline tumour-progression status received lanreotide Autogel 120 mg (n=101) or placebo (n=103) for 96 weeks or until death/progressive disease (PD) in CLARINET study. Patients with stable disease (SD) at core study end (lanreotide/placebo) or PD (placebo only) continued or switched to lanreotide in the OLE. In total, 88 patients (previously: lanreotide, n=41; placebo, n=47) participated: 38% had pancreatic, 39% midgut and 23% other/unknown primary tumours. Patients continuing lanreotide reported fewer adverse events (AEs) (all and treatment-related) during OLE than core study. Placebo-to-lanreotide switch patients reported similar AE rates in OLE and core studies, except more diarrhoea was considered treatment-related in OLE (overall diarrhoea unchanged). Median lanreotide PFS (core study randomisation to PD in core/OLE; n=101) was 32.8 months (95% CI: 30.9, 68.0). A sensitivity analysis, addressing potential selection bias by assuming that patients with SD on lanreotide in the core study and not entering the OLE (n=13) had PD 24 weeks after last core assessment, found median PFS remaining consistent: 30.8 months (95% CI: 30.0, 31.3). Median time to further PD after placebo-to-lanreotide switch (n=32) was 14.0 months (10.1; not reached). This OLE study suggests long-term treatment with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg maintained favourable safety/tolerability. CLARINET OLE data also provide new evidence of lanreotide anti-tumour benefits in indolent and progressive pancreatic/intestinal NETs.
Search for other papers by James C Yao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jonathan Strosberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Fazio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianne E Pavel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emily Bergsland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Ruszniewski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniel M Halperin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daneng Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Salvatore Tafuto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nitya Raj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Campana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susumu Hijioka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Raderer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosine Guimbaud in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pablo Gajate in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Pusceddu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Albert Reising in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Evgeny Degtyarev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mark Shilkrut in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simantini Eddy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simron Singh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Spartalizumab, a humanized anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) MAB, was evaluated in patients with well-differentiated metastatic grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC). In this phase II, multicenter, single-arm study, patients received spartalizumab 400 mg every 4 weeks until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was confirmed overall response rate (ORR) according to blinded independent review committee using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1. The study enrolled 95 patients in the NET group (30, 32 and 33 in the thoracic, gastrointestinal, and pancreatic cohorts, respectively), and 21 patients in the GEP-NEC group. The ORR was 7.4% (95% CI: 3.0, 14.6) in the NET group (thoracic, 16.7%; gastrointestinal, 3.1%; pancreatic, 3.0%), which was below the predefined success criterion of ≥10%, and 4.8% (95% CI: 0.1, 23.8) in the GEP-NEC group. In the NET and GEP-NEC groups, the 12-month progression-free survival was 19.5 and 0%, respectively, and the 12-month overall survival was 73.5 and 19.1%, respectively. The ORR was higher in patients with ≥1% PD-L1 expression in immune/tumor cells or ≥1% CD8+ cells at baseline. The most common adverse events considered as spartalizumab-related included fatigue (29.5%) and nausea (10.5%) in the NET group, and increased aspartate and alanine aminotransferases (each 14.3%) in the GEP-NEC group. The efficacy of spartalizumab was limited in this heterogeneous and heavily pre-treated population; however, the results in the thoracic cohort are encouraging and warrants further investigation. Adverse events were manageable and consistent with previous experience.