Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 18 items for

  • Author: Richard A Feelders x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
Kimberly Kamp
Search for other papers by Kimberly Kamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ronald A M Damhuis Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Netherlands, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, S‐Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Ronald A M Damhuis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard A Feelders
Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Wouter W de Herder
Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

An increased association between neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas (GEP-NET) and other second primary malignancies has been suggested. We determined whether there is indeed an increased risk for second primary malignancies in GEP-NET patients compared with an age- and sex-matched control group of patients with identical malignancies. The series comprised 243 men and 216 women, diagnosed with a GEP-NET between 2000 and 2009 in a tertiary referral center. The timeline, before-at-after diagnosis, and the type of other malignancies were studied using person-year methodology. Poisson distributions were used for testing statistical significance. All data were cross-checked with the Dutch National Cancer Registry. Out of 459 patients with GEP-NET, 67 (13.7%) had a second primary cancer diagnosis: 25 previous cancers (5.4%), 13 synchronous cancers (2.8%), and 29 metachronous cancers (6.3%). The most common types of second primary cancer were breast cancer (n=10), colorectal cancer (n=8), melanoma (n=6), and prostate cancer (n=5). The number of patients with a cancer history was lower than expected, although not significant (n=25 vs n=34.5). The diagnosis of synchronous cancers, mainly colorectal tumors, was higher than expected (n=13 vs n=6.1, P<0.05). Metachronous tumors occurred as frequent as expected (n=29 vs n=25.2, NS). In conclusion, our results are in contrast to previous studies and demonstrate that only the occurrence of synchronous second primary malignancies, mainly colorectal cancers, is increased in GEP-NET patients compared with the general population.

Free access
Anela Blažević Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Anela Blažević in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Johannes Hofland Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Johannes Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Leo J Hofland Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Leo J Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard A Feelders Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Wouter W de Herder Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) are neoplasms characterized by their ability to secrete biogenic amines and peptides. These cause distinct clinical pathology including carcinoid syndrome, marked by diarrhoea and flushing, as well as fibrosis, notably mesenteric fibrosis. Mesenteric fibrosis often results in significant morbidity by causing intestinal obstruction, oedema and ischaemia. Although advancements have been made to alleviate symptoms of carcinoid syndrome and prolong the survival of patients with SI-NETs, therapeutic options for patients with mesenteric fibrosis are still limited. As improved insight in the complex pathogenesis of mesenteric fibrosis is key to the development of new therapies, we evaluated the literature for known and putative mediators of fibrosis in SI-NETs. In this review, we discuss the tumour microenvironment, growth factors and signalling pathways involved in the complex process of fibrosis development and tumour progression in SI-NETs, in order to elucidate potential new avenues for scientific research and therapies to improve the management of patients suffering from the complications of mesenteric fibrosis.

Free access
Aura D Herrera-Martínez Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain

Search for other papers by Aura D Herrera-Martínez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Leo J Hofland Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Leo J Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
María A Gálvez Moreno Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain

Search for other papers by María A Gálvez Moreno in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Justo P Castaño Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain

Search for other papers by Justo P Castaño in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wouter W de Herder Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Richard A Feelders Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Some biomarkers for functioning and non-functioning neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are currently available. Despite their application in clinical practice, results should be interpreted cautiously. Considering the variable sensitivity and specificity of these parameters, there is an unmet need for novel biomarkers to improve diagnosis and predict patient outcome. Nowadays, several new biomarkers are being evaluated and may become future tools for the management of NENs. These biomarkers include (1) peptides and growth factors; (2) DNA and RNA markers based on genomics analysis, for example, the so-called NET test, which has been developed for analyzing gene transcripts in circulating blood; (3) circulating tumor/endothelial/progenitor cells or cell-free tumor DNA, which represent minimally invasive methods that would provide additional information for monitoring treatment response and (4) improved imaging techniques with novel radiolabeled somatostatin analogs or peptides. Below we summarize some future directions in the development of novel diagnostic and predictive/prognostic biomarkers in NENs. This review is focused on circulating and selected tissue markers.

Free access
Wouter T Zandee Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter T Zandee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kimberly Kamp Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Kimberly Kamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roxanne C van Adrichem Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Roxanne C van Adrichem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard A Feelders Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Wouter W de Herder Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The treatment of hormone hypersecretory syndromes caused by neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be a major challenge. NETs originating from the small intestine often secrete serotonin causing flushing, diarrhea and valve fibrosis, leading to dehydration or heart failure in severe cases. NETs from the pancreas can secrete a wider variety of hormones, like insulin, glucagon and gastrin leading to distinct clinical syndromes. Historically mortality in patients with functioning NETs was high due to the complications caused by the hypersecretion of hormones. This has been reduced with several drugs: proton-pump inhibitors decrease acid secretion caused by gastrinomas. Somatostatin analogs can inhibit the secretion of multiple hormones and these are now the cornerstone for treating patients with a gastroenteropancreatic NET. However, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs and everolimus can also decrease symptoms of hypersecretion and increase progression-free survival. Several factors affect the survival in patients with a functioning NET. Complications of hypersecretion negatively impact survival; however, secretion of hormones is also often a sign of a well-differentiated NET and due to the symptoms, functioning NETs can be detected in an earlier stage suggesting a positive effect on prognosis. The effect on survival is also dependent on the type of hormone being secreted. This review aims to study the effect of hormone secretion on the prognosis of NETs with the contemporary treatments options available today.

Free access
Kimberly Kamp Sector of Endocrinology, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro de Oncologia, Department of Pathophysiology, Department of Internal Medicine

Search for other papers by Kimberly Kamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Brenda Gumz Sector of Endocrinology, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro de Oncologia, Department of Pathophysiology, Department of Internal Medicine

Search for other papers by Brenda Gumz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard A Feelders Sector of Endocrinology, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro de Oncologia, Department of Pathophysiology, Department of Internal Medicine

Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dik J Kwekkeboom Sector of Endocrinology, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro de Oncologia, Department of Pathophysiology, Department of Internal Medicine

Search for other papers by Dik J Kwekkeboom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gregory Kaltsas Sector of Endocrinology, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro de Oncologia, Department of Pathophysiology, Department of Internal Medicine

Search for other papers by Gregory Kaltsas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Frederico P Costa Sector of Endocrinology, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro de Oncologia, Department of Pathophysiology, Department of Internal Medicine

Search for other papers by Frederico P Costa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Wouter W de Herder Sector of Endocrinology, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro de Oncologia, Department of Pathophysiology, Department of Internal Medicine

Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Although 177Lu-octreotate is an effective treatment for patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), some patients will fail or develop disease progression necessitating further treatment. We examined whether the safety and efficacy of everolimus after prior treatment with 177Lu-octreotate is different from the published safety profile of everolimus in GEP-NETs. In this multicenter study, 24 GEP-NET patients were included. Adverse events were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. Tumor response was measured according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.0. Major clinical adverse events (grade 3 or 4) during treatment with everolimus were hyperglycemia (20.8%), fatigue (8.3%), thrombocytopenia (8.3%), and elevated alanine transaminase levels (8.3%). By radiological review, there were four partial responses (16.7%), five patients (62.5%) with stable disease, and three patients (12.5%) with progressive disease. For two patients (8.3%), no data on tumor response were available. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.1 months (95% CI, 11.5–21.2). Median PFS of the current study was longer when compared with the RADIANT-3 trial (13.1 vs 11.4 months) and shorter when compared with the RADIANT-1 trial (13.1 vs 16.7 months). In conclusion, the safety profile of everolimus is not influenced by previous treatment with peptide receptor radiotherapy.

Free access
Tessa Brabander Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Tessa Brabander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wouter A van der Zwan Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter A van der Zwan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jaap J M Teunissen Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jaap J M Teunissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Boen L R Kam Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Boen L R Kam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wouter W de Herder Department of Internal Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard A Feelders Department of Internal Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Eric P Krenning Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Eric P Krenning in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Dik J Kwekkeboom Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Dik J Kwekkeboom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate (177Lu-DOTATATE) is a treatment with good results in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEPNETs). However, there are some pitfalls that should be taken into consideration when evaluating the treatment response after PRRT. 354 Dutch patients with GEPNETs who were treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE between March 2000 and December 2011 were retrospectively selected. Liver function parameters and chromogranin A were measured before each therapy and in follow-up. Anatomical imaging was performed before therapy and in follow-up. An increase in aminotransferases by ≥20% compared to baseline was observed in 83 of 351 patients (24%). In patients with an objective response (OR) and stable disease (SD) this increase was observed in 71/297 (24%) and in patients with progressive disease (PD) it was observed in 12/54 patients (22%). An increase in chromogranin A by ≥20% compared to baseline was observed in 76 patients (29%). This was present in 34% of patients who eventually had PD and 27% of patients who had OR/SD. In 70% of patients this tumour marker returned to baseline levels after therapy. An increase in liver enzymes and chromogranin A is not uncommon after PRRT. In the vast majority of patients this will resolve in follow-up. Clinicians should be aware that these changes may occur due to radiation-induced inflammation or disease progression and that repeated measurements over time are necessary to differentiate between the two.

Free access
Anela Blažević Department of Internal Medicine, Section Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumours, Erasmus University Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Anela Blažević in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wouter T Zandee Department of Internal Medicine, Section Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumours, Erasmus University Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter T Zandee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gaston J H Franssen Department of Surgery, ENETS Centre of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumours, Erasmus University Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Gaston J H Franssen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Johannes Hofland Department of Internal Medicine, Section Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumours, Erasmus University Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Johannes Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marie-Louise F van Velthuysen Department of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumours, Erasmus University Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Marie-Louise F van Velthuysen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Leo J Hofland Department of Internal Medicine, Section Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumours, Erasmus University Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Leo J Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard A Feelders Department of Internal Medicine, Section Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumours, Erasmus University Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Wouter W de Herder Department of Internal Medicine, Section Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumours, Erasmus University Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Mesenteric fibrosis (MF) surrounding a mesenteric mass is a hallmark feature of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs). Since this can induce intestinal obstruction, oedema and ischaemia, prophylactic resection of the primary tumour and mesenteric mass is often recommended. This study assessed the predictors for mesenteric metastasis and fibrosis and the effect of MF and palliative surgery on survival. A retrospective analysis of 559 patients with pathologically proven SI-NET and available CT-imaging data was performed. Clinical characteristics, presence of mesenteric mass and fibrosis on CT imaging and the effect of palliative abdominal surgery on overall survival were assessed. We found that MF was present in 41.4%. Older age, 5-HIAA excretion ≥67 μmol/24 h, serum CgA ≥121.5 μg/L and a mesenteric mass ≥27.5 mm were independent predictors of MF. In patients ≤52 years, mesenteric mass was less often found in women than in men (39% vs 64%, P = 0.002). Corrected for age, tumour grade, CgA and liver metastasis, MF was not a prognostic factor for overall survival. In patients undergoing palliative surgery, metastasectomy of mesenteric mass or prophylactic surgery did not result in survival benefit. In conclusion, we confirmed known predictors of MF and mesenteric mass and suggest a role for sex hormones as women ≤52 years have less often a mesenteric mass. Furthermore, the presence of MF has no effect on survival in a multivariate analysis, and we found no benefit of metastasectomy of mesenteric mass or prophylactic surgery on overall survival.

Free access
Julie Refardt ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Julie Refardt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wouter T Zandee ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter T Zandee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tessa Brabander ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Tessa Brabander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard A Feelders ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gaston J H Franssen Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Gaston J H Franssen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Leo J Hofland ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Leo J Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Emanuel Christ ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Emanuel Christ in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wouter W de Herder ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Johannes Hofland ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Johannes Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Sufficient expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is crucial for treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using radiolabeled SSAs. Impaired prognosis has been described for SSTR-negative NET patients; however, studies comparing matched SSTR-positive and -negative subjects who have not received PRRT are missing. This retrospective analysis of two prospectively maintained NET databases aimed to compare matched metastatic grade 1 or 2 SSTR-positive and –negative NET patients. SSTR-negativity was defined as having insufficient tumor uptake on diagnostic SSTR imaging. Patients that underwent PRRT were excluded. Seventy-seven SSTR-negative and 248 SSTR-positive grade 1–2 NET patients were included. Median overall survival rates were significantly lower for SSTR-negative compared to SSTR-positive NET patients (53 months vs 131 months; P < 0.001). To adjust for possible confounding by age, gender, grade and site of origin, 69 SSTR-negative NET patients were propensity score matched to 69 SSTR-positive NET patients. Group characteristics were similar, with the exception of SSTR-negative patients receiving more often chemotherapy and targeted treatment. The inferior survival outcome of SSTR-negative compared to SSTR-positive NET patients persisted with a median overall survival of 38 months vs 131 months (P = 0.012). This relationship upheld when correcting for the main influencing factors of having a higher grade tumor or receiving surgery in a multivariate Cox regression analysis. In conclusion, we showed that propensity score-matched SSTR-negative NET patients continue to have a worse prognosis compared to SSTR-positive NET patients despite receiving more aggressive treatment. Differences in tumor biology likely underlie this survival deficit.

Restricted access
Maria Cristina De Martino Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Maria Cristina De Martino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter M van Koetsveld Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Peter M van Koetsveld in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard A Feelders Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Diana Sprij-Mooij Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Diana Sprij-Mooij in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marlijn Waaijers Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Marlijn Waaijers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Steven W J Lamberts Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Steven W J Lamberts in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wouter W de Herder Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Annamaria Colao Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Annamaria Colao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rosario Pivonello Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Rosario Pivonello in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Leo J Hofland Division of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee530b, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Leo J Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) need new treatment options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the mTOR inhibitors sirolimus and temsirolimus on human ACC cell growth and cortisol production. In H295, HAC15, and SW13 cells, we have evaluated mTOR, IGF2, and IGF1 receptor expressions; the effects of sirolimus and temsirolimus on cell growth; and the effects of sirolimus on apoptosis, cell cycle, and cortisol production. Moreover, the effects of sirolimus on basal and IGF2-stimulated H295 cell colony growth and on basal and IGF1-stimulated phospho-AKT, phospho-S6K1, and phospho-ERK in H295 and SW13 were studied. Finally, we have evaluated the effects of combination treatment of sirolimus with an IGF2-neutralizing antibody. We have found that H295 and HAC15 expressed IGF2 at a >1800-fold higher level than SW13. mTOR inhibitors suppressed cell growth in a dose-/time-dependent manner in all cell lines. SW13 were the most sensitive to these effects. Sirolimus inhibited H295 colony surviving fraction and size. These effects were not antagonized by IGF2, suggesting the involvement of other autocrine regulators of mTOR pathways. In H295, sirolimus activated escape pathways. The blocking of endogenously produced IGF2 increased the antiproliferative effects of sirolimus on H295. Cortisol production by H295 and HAC15 was inhibited by sirolimus. The current study demonstrates that mTOR inhibitors inhibit the proliferation and cortisol production in ACC cells. Different ACC cells have different sensitivity to the mTOR inhibitors. mTOR could be a target for the treatment of human ACCs, but variable responses might be expected. In selected cases of ACC, the combined targeting of mTOR and IGF2 could have greater effects than mTOR inhibitors alone.

Free access
Julie Refardt ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Julie Refardt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Caroline M den Hoed Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Caroline M den Hoed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Janneke Langendonk Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Janneke Langendonk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wouter T Zandee Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter T Zandee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ayoub Charehbili ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Ayoub Charehbili in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard A Feelders ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wouter W de Herder ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tessa Brabander ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Tessa Brabander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Johannes Hofland ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Johannes Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare, usually slow-growing tumors, often presenting with extensive liver metastases. Hyperammonemia due to insufficient hepatic clearance has been described in NEN cases; however, no systematic evaluation of risk factors and outcomes of NEN-associated hyperammonemia exists so far. This case report and retrospective review of NEN patients developing hyperammonemia from the years 2000 to 2020 at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, aimed to describe these patients and determine prognostic factors to improve evaluation and treatment. Forty-four NEN patients with documented hyperammonemia were identified. All patients had liver metastases with 30% (n = 13) showing signs of portal hypertension. Patients who developed encephalopathy had higher median ammonia levels, but there was no association between the severity of hyperammonemia and liver tumor burden or presence of liver insufficiency. Eighty-four percent (n = 37) of patients died during follow-up. The median (IQR) time from diagnosis of hyperammonemia to death was 1.7 months (0.1–22.7). Hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, elevated international normalized ratio, presence of liver insufficiency, encephalopathy and ascites were associated with worse outcomes. Their role as independent risk factors for mortality was confirmed using the Child–Pugh score as a summary factor (P  < 0.001). No difference was seen concerning overall survival between our hyperammonemia patients and a propensity score-matched control stage IV NEN cohort. In conclusion, hyperammonemia comprises a relevant and potentially underdiagnosed complication of NEN liver metastases and is associated with worse outcomes. Assessment of signs of encephalopathy, risk factors and the Child–Pugh score could be helpful in selecting patients in whom ammonia levels should be measured.

Restricted access