Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for
- Author: Sara Massironi x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by Nicola Fazio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Molecular Medicine Program, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
Search for other papers by Lorenzo Gervaso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thorvardur R Halfdanarson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mohamad Sonbol in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachel A Eiring in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Pusceddu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalie Prinzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benedetta Lombardi Stocchetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David J Gross in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Walter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patrick Robelin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Catherine Lombard-Bohas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Samuele Frassoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vincenzo Bagnardi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for other papers by Lorenzo Antonuzzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Clotilde Sparano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Massironi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fabio Gelsomino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto Bongiovanni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicoletta Ranallo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Salvatore Tafuto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maura Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mauro Cives in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ibrahim Rasul Kakil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hytam Hamid in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandra Chirco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michela Squadroni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna La Salvia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jorge Hernando in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johannes Hofland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna Koumarianou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sabrina Boselli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Darina Tamayo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cristina Mazzon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manila Rubino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesca Spada in
Google Scholar
PubMed
We conducted a retrospective/prospective worldwide study on patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and a molecularly proven SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Preliminary results regarding 85 patients of the INTENSIVE study have been published in 2021. Now we are reporting the 2-year analysis.Here, we are reporting data from consecutive patients enrolled between 1 June 2020, and 31 May 2022. Among the 118 contacted centers, 25 were active to enroll and 19 actively recruiting at the time of data cut-off for a total of 280 patients enrolled. SARS-CoV-2 positivity occurred in 47.5% of patients in 2020, 35.1% in 2021, and 17.4% in 2022. The median age for COVID-19 diagnosis was 60 years. Well-differentiated tumors, non-functioning, metastatic stage, and gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) primary sites represented most of the NENs. COVID-19-related pneumonia occurred in 22.8% of the total, with 61.3% of them requiring hospitalization; 11 patients (3.9%) needed sub-intensive or intensive care unit therapies and 14 patients died (5%), in 11 cases (3.9%) directly related to COVID-19. Diabetes mellitus and age at COVID-19 diagnosis > 70 years were significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality, whereas thoracic primary site with COVID-19 morbidity. A significant decrease in both hospitalization and pneumonia occurred in 2022 vs 2020. In our largest series of NEN patients with COVID-19, the NEN population is similar to the general population of patients with NEN regardless of COVID-19. However, older age, non-GEP primary sites and diabetes mellitus should be carefully considered for increased COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Relevant information could be derived by integrating our results with NENs patients included in other cancer patients with COVID-19 registries.
Search for other papers by Sara Pusceddu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesco Barretta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Annalisa Trama in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Botta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Massimo Milione in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roberto Buzzoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Filippo De Braud in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Liver Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, University of Milan and Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione IRCCS, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milano, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Vincenzo Mazzaferro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ugo Pastorino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ettore Seregni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luigi Mariani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gemma Gatta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Di Bartolomeo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniela Femia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalie Prinzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jorgelina Coppa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesco Panzuto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lorenzo Antonuzzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emilio Bajetta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Pia Brizzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Campana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Catena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harry Comber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fiona Dwane in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Fazio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antongiulio Faggiano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dario Giuffrida in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kris Henau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Toni Ibrahim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Riccardo Marconcini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Massironi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maja Primic Žakelj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesca Spada in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Salvatore Tafuto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizabeth Van Eycken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Maaten Van der Zwan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tina Žagar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luca Giacomelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosalba Miceli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by NEPscore Working Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
No validated prognostic tool is available for predicting overall survival (OS) of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs). This study, conducted in three independent cohorts of patients from five different European countries, aimed to develop and validate a classification prognostic score for OS in patients with stage IV WDNETs. We retrospectively collected data on 1387 patients: (i) patients treated at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milan, Italy; n = 515); (ii) European cohort of rare NET patients included in the European RARECAREnet database (n = 457); (iii) Italian multicentric cohort of pancreatic NET (pNETs) patients treated at 24 Italian institutions (n = 415). The score was developed using data from patients included in cohort (i) (training set); external validation was performed by applying the score to the data of the two independent cohorts (ii) and (iii) evaluating both calibration and discriminative ability (Harrell C statistic). We used data on age, primary tumor site, metastasis (synchronous vs metachronous), Ki-67, functional status and primary surgery to build the score, which was developed for classifying patients into three groups with differential 10-year OS: (I) favorable risk group: 10-year OS ≥70%; (II) intermediate risk group: 30% ≤ 10-year OS < 70%; (III) poor risk group: 10-year OS <30%. The Harrell C statistic was 0.661 in the training set, and 0.626 and 0.601 in the RARECAREnet and Italian multicentric validation sets, respectively. In conclusion, based on the analysis of three ‘field-practice’ cohorts collected in different settings, we defined and validated a prognostic score to classify patients into three groups with different long-term prognoses.