Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for

  • Author: Simon P Langdon x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
Colette Meyer
Search for other papers by Colette Meyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrew H Sims
Search for other papers by Andrew H Sims in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kevin Morgan Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit and Division of Pathology, Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Centre for Integrative Physiology, Mammal Research Institute, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK

Search for other papers by Kevin Morgan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Beth Harrison
Search for other papers by Beth Harrison in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Morwenna Muir
Search for other papers by Morwenna Muir in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jianing Bai
Search for other papers by Jianing Bai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dana Faratian
Search for other papers by Dana Faratian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert P Millar Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit and Division of Pathology, Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Centre for Integrative Physiology, Mammal Research Institute, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit and Division of Pathology, Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Centre for Integrative Physiology, Mammal Research Institute, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK

Search for other papers by Robert P Millar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Simon P Langdon
Search for other papers by Simon P Langdon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

GNRH significantly inhibits proliferation of a proportion of cancer cell lines by activating GNRH receptor (GNRHR)-G protein signaling. Therefore, manipulation of GNRHR signaling may have an under-utilized role in treating certain breast and ovarian cancers. However, the precise signaling pathways necessary for the effect and the features of cellular responses remain poorly defined. We used transcriptomic and proteomic profiling approaches to characterize the effects of GNRHR activation in sensitive cells (HEK293-GNRHR, SCL60) in vitro and in vivo, compared to unresponsive HEK293. Analyses of gene expression demonstrated a dynamic response to the GNRH superagonist Triptorelin. Early and mid-phase changes (0.5–1.0 h) comprised mainly transcription factors. Later changes (8–24 h) included a GNRH target gene, CGA, and up- or downregulation of transcripts encoding signaling and cell division machinery. Pathway analysis identified altered MAPK and cell cycle pathways, consistent with occurrence of G2/M arrest and apoptosis. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway gene transcripts were differentially expressed between control and Triptorelin-treated SCL60 cultures. Reverse-phase protein and phospho-proteomic array analyses profiled responses in cultured cells and SCL60 xenografts in vivo during Triptorelin anti-proliferation. Increased phosphorylated NF-κB (p65) occurred in SCL60 in vitro, and p-NF-κB and IκBε were higher in treated xenografts than controls after 4 days Triptorelin. NF-κB inhibition enhanced the anti-proliferative effect of Triptorelin in SCL60 cultures. This study reveals details of pathways interacting with intense GNRHR signaling, identifies potential anti-proliferative target genes, and implicates the NF-κB survival pathway as a node for enhancing GNRH agonist-induced anti-proliferation.

Open access
Barbara Kuske
Search for other papers by Barbara Kuske in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Catherine Naughton
Search for other papers by Catherine Naughton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kate Moore
Search for other papers by Kate Moore in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kenneth G MacLeod
Search for other papers by Kenneth G MacLeod in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
William R Miller
Search for other papers by William R Miller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert Clarke
Search for other papers by Robert Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Simon P Langdon
Search for other papers by Simon P Langdon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David A Cameron
Search for other papers by David A Cameron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Hormone-dependent estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells may adapt to low estrogen environments such as produced by aromatase inhibitors. In many instances, cells become insensitive to the effects of estrogen but may still retain dependence on ER. We have investigated the expression, function, and activation of ERα in two endocrine-resistant MCF-7 models to identify mechanisms that could contribute to resistance. While MCF-7/LCC1 cells are partially estrogen dependent, MCF-7/LCC9 cells are fully estrogen insensitive and fulvestrant and tamoxifen resistant. In both MCF-7/LCC1 and MCF-7/LCC9 cell lines, high expression of ERα was associated with enhanced binding to the trefoil factor 1 (TFF1) promoter in the absence of estrogen and increased transcription of TFF1 and progesterone receptor. In contrast to the observations derived from hypersensitive and supersensitive models, these cells were truly estrogen independent; nevertheless, removal of ERα by siRNA, or fulvestrant, a specific ER downregulator, inhibited growth indicating dependence on ERα. In the absence of estrogen, neither ERα Ser118 nor Ser167 were phosphorylated as frequently found in other ligand-independent cell line models. Addition of estrogen activated ERα Ser118 in MCF-7 and LCC1 cells but not in LCC9 cells. We suggest that the estrogen-independent growth within these cell lines is accounted for by high levels of ERα expression driving transcription and full estrogen independence explained by lack of ERα activation through Ser118.

Free access
Amanda J M O’Donnell Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK

Search for other papers by Amanda J M O’Donnell in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kenneth G Macleod Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK

Search for other papers by Kenneth G Macleod in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David J Burns Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK

Search for other papers by David J Burns in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John F Smyth Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK

Search for other papers by John F Smyth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Simon P Langdon Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK

Search for other papers by Simon P Langdon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Estrogens play a significant role in the development, growth, invasion and metastasis of ovarian tumors. The transcriptional program regulated by 17β-estradiol (E2) in human ovarian cancer cell lines was analyzed using cDNA microarrays containing 1200 cancer-related genes. Twenty-eight transcripts had at least a threefold change in expression in E2-treated PEO1 ovarian carcinoma cells compared with controls. These differences were confirmed by real-time quantitative PCR and shown to be dependent upon the expression of functional estrogen receptor-α (ERα). Consistent with this, these gene expression changes were blocked by the anti-estrogen tamoxifen. The use of ERα- and ERβ-specific ligands allowed molecular dissection of the E2 response and showed that ERα activation was responsible for the observed changes in gene expression, whereas ERβ played no significant role. Inhibition of de novo protein synthesis by cycloheximide was used to distinguish between primary and secondary target genes regulated by E2. Actinomycin D was used to show that changes in gene expression levels induced by E2 were a result of changes in transcription and not due to changes in mRNA stability. The results presented here demonstrate that estrogen-driven growth of epithelial ovarian carcinoma is mediated by activation of ERα-mediated, and not ERβ-mediated, transcription.

Free access