Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for
- Author: Thierry de Baere x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by Cecile N Chougnet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sophie Leboulleux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Caroline Caramella in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean Lumbroso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Isabelle Borget in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Désirée Déandreis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre Duvillard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dominique Elias in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thierry de Baere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fritz-Line Vélayoudom-Céphise in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joël Guigay in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michel Ducreux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Schlumberger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Baudin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Recent studies suggest that the somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) grade of uptake is a predictor of response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). To identify and characterize patients with well-differentiated (WD) neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) displaying a high-grade uptake at SRS. Patients with WD-NEN, whose SRS films were available for review, were retrospectively included. SRS was reviewed by three independent readers and classified into four subgroups based on a modified Krenning's scale (mKS): no uptake (group-0), homogeneous grade 1–2 uptake (group-1), homogeneous grade 3–4 (group-2), and heterogeneous grade 1–4 (group-3). A simplified scale (sS) of SRS was also used to look for characteristics of patients with high-grade uptake. One hundred and six WD-NEN patients were enrolled. Group-0, group-1, group-2, and group-3 were found in 17, 8, 33, and 42% of cases respectively. High-grade uptake at sS (75% of cases) was correlated with older age, functioning NEN, high chromogranin-A level, and grade 1 (G1) NEN based on mitotic count. Based on the mKS or sS scales, no difference on survival was found. Thirty-three to seventy-five percent of metastatic NEN patients can be considered candidates for PRRT based on homogeneous or heterogeneous high-grade uptake. Functioning G1 NEN patients could be the best candidates for PRRT. Randomized trials are expected to confirm this result.
Search for other papers by Cosimo Durante in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Houda Boukheris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Clarisse Dromain in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre Duvillard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sophie Leboulleux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dominique Elias in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thierry de Baere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Malka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean Lumbroso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joël Guigay in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Schlumberger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michel Ducreux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Baudin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Survival of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma (GEP WDEC) is not well characterized. We evaluated the long-term outcome and prognostic factors for survival in 118 patients with distant metastases from GEP WDEC. Inclusion criteria were 1) pathological review by a single pathologist according to the present WHO criteria, 2) absence of previous therapy apart from surgery, 3) complete morphological evaluation within 3 months including somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and 4) follow-up at Gustave-Roussy Institute until death or study's end. Clinical, biological marker, and pathological parameters were analyzed in univariate and multivariate statistical models. Survival after the first complete imaging work-up of the metastatic disease was determined using Kaplan–Meier method. Overall, survival for 5 years after the diagnosis of metastatic disease was 54%. In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.08, P=0.01), the number of liver metastases (HR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.4–8.3, P=0.01), tumor slope (HR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0–1.1, P=0.001), and initial surgery (HR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1–0.8, P=0.01) were predictive of survival. Five-year survival was 100%, 91% (95% CI, 51–98%), 62% (95% CI, 37–83%), and 9% (95% CI, 6–32%) when patients had 0, 1, 2, 3 or more poor prognostic features respectively. This study enables the stratification of metastatic GEP WDEC patients into distinct risk groups. These risk categories can be used to tailor therapeutic approaches and also to design and interpret clinical trials.
Search for other papers by Pasqualino Malandrino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Abir Al Ghuzlan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marine Castaing in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jacques Young in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bernard Caillou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean-Paul Travagli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dominique Elias in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thierry de Baere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Clarisse Dromain in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angelo Paci in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Chanson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Schlumberger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sophie Leboulleux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Baudin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
To progress in the stratification of the first-line therapeutic management of metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), we searched for prognostic parameters of survival in patients treated with combined mitotane- and cisplatinum-based chemotherapy as first-line. We retrospectively studied prospectively collected parameters from 131 consecutive patients with metastatic ACC (44 with a tissue specimen available) treated at the Gustave Roussy Institute with mitotane- and platinum-based chemotherapy. Fifty-five patients with clinical, pathological, and morphological data available together with treatment characteristics including detailed follow-up were enrolled. Plasma mitotane levels and ERCC1 protein staining were analyzed. Response was analyzed according to RECIST criteria as well as overall survival (OS) from the start of cisplatinum-based chemotherapy. Parameters impacting on OS were evaluated by univariate analysis, and then analyzed by multivariate analysis. Using a landmark method, OS according to response to chemotherapy was analyzed. Objective response to combined mitotane- and cisplatinum-based chemotherapy was 27.3%. Median OS was 1 year. In the univariate analysis, resection of the primary, time since diagnosis, mitotane monotherapy as single first-line treatment, number of affected organs, plasma mitotane above 14 mg/l, and objective response were predictors of survival. In the multivariate analysis, mitotane level ≥14 mg/l and objective response to platinum-based chemotherapy were found to be independent predictors of survival (P=0.03 and <0.001). Our study suggests a prognostic role for mitotane therapy and objective response to platinum-based chemotherapy.