Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: W Buikhuisen x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
E Baudin Endocrine Oncology Unit, Imaging Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Search for other papers by E Baudin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J Capdevila Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB Quirón-Teknon, Barcelona, Spain

Search for other papers by J Capdevila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D Hörsch ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany

Search for other papers by D Hörsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S Singh Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook HSC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by S Singh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M E Caplin Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK

Search for other papers by M E Caplin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E M Wolin Division of Hematology and Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

Search for other papers by E M Wolin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W Buikhuisen Department of Thorax Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by W Buikhuisen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M Raderer Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Search for other papers by M Raderer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E Dansin Thoracic Oncology Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France

Search for other papers by E Dansin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C Grohe Department of Respiratory Diseases, Evangelische Lungenklinik, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by C Grohe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D Ferone Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genova, Genova, Italy

Search for other papers by D Ferone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A Houchard Data and Insights Generation and Strategy, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France

Search for other papers by A Houchard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
X-M Truong-Thanh Medical Affairs, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France

Search for other papers by X-M Truong-Thanh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D Reidy-Lagunes Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA

Search for other papers by D Reidy-Lagunes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
the SPINET Study Group
Search for other papers by the SPINET Study Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
the SPINET Study Group

Prospective data are lacking on early somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (BP-NETs; typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids (TCs and ACs)). SPINET (EudraCT: 2015-004992-62; NCT02683941) was a phase III, double-blind study of lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN; 120 mg every 28 days) plus best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo plus BSC, with an optional open-label treatment phase (LAN plus BSC). Patients had metastatic/unresectable, somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive TCs or ACs. Recruitment was stopped early owing to slow accrual; eligible patients from the double-blind phase transitioned to open-label LAN. The adapted primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) during either phase for patients receiving LAN. Seventy-seven patients were randomized (LAN, n = 51 (TCs, n = 29; ACs, n = 22); placebo, n = 26 (TCs, n = 16; ACs, n = 10)). Median (95% CI) PFS during double-blind and open-label phases in patients receiving LAN was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months overall (primary endpoint), 21.9 (12.8, not calculable (NC)) months in TCs, and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) months in ACs. During double-blind treatment, median (95% CI) PFS was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months for LAN vs 13.6 (8.3; NC) months for placebo (not significant); corresponding values were 21.9 (13.8; NC) and 13.9 (13.4; NC) months, respectively, in TCs and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) and 11.0 (2.8; 16.9) months, respectively, in ACs. Patients’ quality of life did not deteriorate and LAN was well tolerated. Although recruitment stopped early and the predefined sample size was not met, SPINET is the largest prospective study to date of SSA therapy in SSTR-positive TCs and ACs and suggests clinical benefit in TCs.

Open access
Laura Moonen Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Laura Moonen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jules L Derks Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jules L Derks in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lisa M Hillen Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Lisa M Hillen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert Jan van Suylen Pathology-DNA, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, s’Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Robert Jan van Suylen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael A den Bakker Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Michael A den Bakker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jan H von der Thüsen Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jan H von der Thüsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ronald A Damhuis Department of Research, Comprehensive Cancer Association, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Ronald A Damhuis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wieneke A Buikhuisen Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wieneke A Buikhuisen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Esther C van den Broek PALGA (Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank), Houten, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Esther C van den Broek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jos Maessen Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jos Maessen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alexander P W M Maat Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Alexander P W M Maat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paul van Schil Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium

Search for other papers by Paul van Schil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ernst J M Speel Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Ernst J M Speel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
A-M C Dingemans Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by A-M C Dingemans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The predictive value of the extent of peri-operative lymph node (LN) sampling in relation to disease relapse in patients with pulmonary carcinoid (PC) is unknown. Furthermore, post-surgery follow-up recommendations rely on institutional retrospective studies with short follow-ups. We aimed to address these shortcomings by examining the relation between LN sampling and relapse in a population-based cohort with long-term follow-up. By combining the Dutch nationwide pathology and cancer registries, all patients with surgically resected PC (2003–2012) were included in this analysis (last update 2020). The extent of surgical LN dissection was scored for the number of LN samples, location (hilar/mediastinal), and completeness of resection according to European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) guidelines. Relapse-free interval (RFI) was evaluated using Kaplan Meier and multivariate regression analysis. 662 patients were included. The median follow-up was 87.5 months. Relapse occurred in 10% of patients, mostly liver (51.8%) and locoregional sites (45%). The median RFI was 48.1 months (95% CI 36.8–59.4). Poor prognostic factors were atypical carcinoid, pN1/2, and R1/R2 resection. In 546 patients LN dissection data could be retrieved; at least one N2 LN was examined in 44% and completeness according to ESTS in merely 7%. In 477 cN0 patients, 5.9% had pN1 and 2.5% had pN2 disease. In conclusion, relapse occurred in 10% of PC patients with a median RFI of 48.1 months thereby underscoring the necessity of long-term follow-up. Extended mediastinal LN sampling was rarely performed but systematic nodal evaluation is recommended as it provides prognostic information on distant relapse.

Restricted access