Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for
- Author: Young Kee Shong x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by Eyun Song in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dong Eun Song in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jonghwa Ahn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tae Yong Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Won Bae Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Young Kee Shong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Min Ji Jeon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Won Gu Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Major clinical challenges exist with differentiated thyroid cancers with distant metastases or rare but aggressive types, such as poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. The precise characterization of the mutational profile in these advanced thyroid cancers is crucial. Samples were collected from primary tumors and distant metastases of 64 patients with distant metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma, or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed with 50 known thyroid-cancer-related genes. Of the 82 tissues, 63 were from primary tumors and 19 from distant metastases. The most prevalent mutation observed from the primary tumors was TERT promoter mutation (56%), followed by BRAF (41%) and RAS (24%) mutations. TP3 was altered by 11%. Mutations in histone methyltransferases, SWI/SNF subunit–related genes, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway-related genes were present in 42%, 12%, and 22%, respectively. When the mutational status was analyzed in 15 matched pairs of thyroid tumors and their matched distant metastases and one pair of distant metastases with two distinct sites, the concordance was high. A similar frequency of mutations in TERT promoter (58%) and BRAF (42%) as well as histone methyltransferases (37%), SWI/SNF subunits (10%), and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway (26%) were noted. The same main, early and late mutations were practically always present in individual primary tumor–metastasis pairs. Enrichment of TERT promoter, BRAF, and RAS mutations were detected in highly advanced thyroid cancers with distant metastasis. The genetic profiles of primary thyroid tumors and their corresponding distant metastases showed a high concordance.
Search for other papers by Yeon-Sook Choi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hyemi Kwon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mi-Hyeon You in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tae Yong Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Won Bae Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Young Kee Shong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Min Ji Jeon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Won Gu Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dabrafenib is a BRAF kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of BRAF-mutated anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) in combination with trametinib. Erlotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGF receptor (EGFR). We evaluated effects of dabrafenib and erlotinib combination treatment on ATC cells in vitro and in vivo. Cell proliferation, colony formation, apoptosis, and migration of ATC cells harboring a BRAF mutation (BHT101, 8505C, and SW1736) were evaluated after treatment with dabrafenib in combination with erlotinib or trametinib. The changes in activation of mitogen extracellular kinase (MEK) and extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) signaling were also evaluated by Western blot analysis. Effects of these combinations were also evaluated using an in vivo xenograft model. First, we detected EGFR activation in dabrafenib-resistant SW1736 cells using a phospho-receptor tyrosine kinase array. A dabrafenib and erlotinib combination synergistically inhibited cell proliferation, colony formation, and migration, with an induction of apoptotic cell death in all three ATC cells, compared with dabrafenib or erlotinib alone. This synergistic effect was comparable with a dabrafenib and trametinib combination. The dabrafenib and erlotinib combination effectively inhibited phosphorylated (p)-MEK, p-ERK, and p-EGFR expressions compared with dabrafenib or erlotinib alone, while the dabrafenib and trametinib combination only inhibited p-MEK and p-ERK expressions. The dabrafenib with erlotinib or trametinib combinations also significantly suppressed tumor growth and induced apoptosis in a BHT101 xenograft model. The dabrafenib and erlotinib combination could be a potential novel treatment regimen to overcome drug resistance to dabrafenib alone in patients with BRAF-mutated ATC.
Search for other papers by Francis Worden in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Endocrine Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Radiotherapy Department, Institut Bergonie, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Asan Medicine Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Pharma AG, Institut Gustave Roussy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Search for other papers by Martin Fassnacht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Endocrine Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Radiotherapy Department, Institut Bergonie, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Asan Medicine Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Pharma AG, Institut Gustave Roussy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Search for other papers by Yuankai Shi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tatiana Hadjieva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Françoise Bonichon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ming Gao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Endocrine Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Radiotherapy Department, Institut Bergonie, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Asan Medicine Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Pharma AG, Institut Gustave Roussy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Search for other papers by Laura Fugazzola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuichi Ando in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yasuhisa Hasegawa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Do Joon Park in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Young Kee Shong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johannes W A Smit in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John Chung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Kappeler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gerold Meinhardt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Schlumberger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marcia S Brose in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Effective adverse event (AE) management is critical to maintaining patients on anticancer therapies. The DECISION trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial which investigated sorafenib for treatment of progressive, advanced, or metastatic radioactive iodine-refractory, differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Four hundred and seventeen adult patients were randomized (1:1) to receive oral sorafenib (400 mg, twice daily) or placebo, until progression, unacceptable toxicity, noncompliance, or withdrawal. Progression-free survival, the primary endpoint of DECISION, was reported previously. To elucidate the patterns and management of AEs in sorafenib-treated patients in the DECISION trial, this report describes detailed, by-treatment-cycle analyses of the incidence, prevalence, and severity of hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR), rash/desquamation, hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, weight loss, increased serum thyroid stimulating hormone, and hypocalcemia, as well as the interventions used to manage these AEs. By-cycle incidence of the above-selected AEs with sorafenib was generally highest in cycle 1 or 2 then decreased. AE prevalence generally increased over cycles 2–6 then stabilized or declined. Among these AEs, only weight loss tended to increase in severity (from grade 1 to 2) over time; severity of HFSR and rash/desquamation declined over time. AEs were mostly grade 1 or 2, and were generally managed with dose interruptions/reductions, and concomitant medications (e.g. antidiarrheals, antihypertensives, dermatologic preparations). Most dose interruptions/reductions occurred in early cycles. In conclusion, AEs with sorafenib in DECISION were typically grade 1 or 2, occurred early during the treatment course, and were manageable over time.
Search for other papers by Hye In Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Meihua Jin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nak Gyeong Ko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Young Lyun Oh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jung Hee Shin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jung-Han Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jee Soo Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Min Ji Jeon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tae Yong Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sun Wook Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Won Bae Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jae Hoon Chung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Young Kee Shong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Won Gu Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tae Hyuk Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
We previously reported that high thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels are associated with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) progression during active surveillance. However, validation with multicenter, long-term data, and identification of appropriate age or TSH levels are needed. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled PTMC patients under active surveillance with TSH measurements and ultrasonography. The primary outcome was PTMC progression (volume increase ≥50%, size increase ≥3 mm, or new lymph node (LN) metastasis). PTMC progression according to time-weighted average of TSH (TW-TSH) groups was compared using survival analyses in overall patients and each age subgroups (<40, 40–49, 50–59, and ≥60 years). The identification of TW-TSH cutoff point for PTMC progression and trend analysis of PTMC progression rate according to LT4 treatment were also performed. During 1061 person-years of follow-up, 93 of 234 patients (39.7%) showed PTMC progression (90, 17, and 5 patients for volume increase ≥50%, size increase ≥3 mm, and new LN metastasis, respectively). The highest TW-TSH group was the risk factor most strongly associated with PTMC progression (hazard ratio 2.13 (1.24–3.65); P = 0.006), but the impact was significant only in patients aged <40 or 40–49 years (hazard ratio 30.79 (2.90–326.49; P = 0.004), 2.55 (1.00–6.47; P = 0.049)). For patients aged <50 years, TW-TSH cutoff for PTMC progression was 1.74 mU/L, and PTMC progression rates successively increased in the order of effective, no, and ineffective LT4 treatment group (P for trend = 0.034). In young PTMC patients (<50 years), sustained low-normal TSH levels during active surveillance might be helpful to prevent progression.