Search Results
Search for other papers by Maria Riedmeier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lester D R Thompson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos Augusto Fernandes Molina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Boris Decarolis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph Härtel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Comprehensive Cancer Centre Mainfranken, University of Wuerzburg Medical Centre, Wuerzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Paul-G Schlegel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Martin Fassnacht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Comprehensive Cancer Centre Mainfranken, University of Wuerzburg Medical Centre, Wuerzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Verena Wiegering in
Google Scholar
PubMed
remains difficult, and clinical prediction and stratification scores are not evaluated yet in pediatric settings. The Weiss histopathologic scoring system, intended and well established for the classification of adrenocortical neoplasms in adults
Search for other papers by D Cecchin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Lumachi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M C Marzola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Opocher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Scaroni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P Zucchetta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Mantero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Bui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
apparently positive 123 I-MIBG scan ( Maurea et al. 1995 ), has not, to our knowledge, been fully clarified in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of a scoring system, based on different uptakes of the
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Carla Colombo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marina Muzza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gabriele Pogliaghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sonia Palazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guia Vannucchi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leonardo Vicentini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Luca Persani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giacomo Gazzano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Laura Fugazzola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
found in TC ( Pesenti et al. 2018 , Colombo et al. 2019 ). To further increase the sensitivity and specificity of this molecular tool, we set up an unprecedented ‘thyroid risk score’ system (TRS) based on the combination of clinical, ultrasound
College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, College of Medicine, Graduate Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Section 1, Jen‐Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan
College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, College of Medicine, Graduate Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Section 1, Jen‐Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Yu-Li Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cheng-Yang Chou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ming-Cheng Chang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Han-Wei Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ching-Ting Huang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shu-Feng Hsieh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chi-An Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, College of Medicine, Graduate Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Section 1, Jen‐Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan
College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, College of Medicine, Graduate Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Section 1, Jen‐Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Wen-Fang Cheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
used as the derivation group to select target clinical and immunological factors to generate a risk-scoring system to predict patient survival. Eighty-two cases from another hospital were used as the validation group to evaluate this risk-scoring system
Search for other papers by Dong Hyun Seo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Seul Gi Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Soon Min Choi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ha Yan Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sunmi Park in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sang Geun Jung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Young Suk Jo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jandee Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
was performed, and data labeling for each scoring system was indicated as follows: (1) differentiation score (DF), TERT (−) PTC was labeled as a positive input against the others; (2) immune resistance score (IR), TERT (+) PTC was labeled as a
Search for other papers by Benjamin Easton White in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maralyn R Druce in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eva Maria Gamper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Debra Gray in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ruben Mujica-Mota in
Google Scholar
PubMed
King’s Health Partners ENETS Centre of Excellence, Kings College hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by John K Ramage in
Google Scholar
PubMed
development. Clinical validation is ongoing, including in NEN patients (personal communication with project PI). The use of HRQoL scores in published data HRQoL measured in NEN clinical trials Use of QoL scoring systems in NEN trials was reviewed
Search for other papers by Marie McIlroy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fergal J Fleming in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yvonne Buggy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arnold D K Hill in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leonie S Young in
Google Scholar
PubMed
assessed using a modified Allred scoring system. SRC3 expression was significantly elevated in metastatic tumours following endocrine treatment in HER2 positive patients ( P =0.038, n =3 patients/group, Students t test), but not in HER2 negative patients
Search for other papers by Sara Pusceddu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesco Barretta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Annalisa Trama in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Botta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Massimo Milione in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roberto Buzzoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Filippo De Braud in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Liver Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, University of Milan and Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione IRCCS, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milano, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Vincenzo Mazzaferro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ugo Pastorino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ettore Seregni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luigi Mariani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gemma Gatta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Di Bartolomeo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniela Femia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalie Prinzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jorgelina Coppa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesco Panzuto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lorenzo Antonuzzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emilio Bajetta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Pia Brizzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Campana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Catena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harry Comber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fiona Dwane in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Fazio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antongiulio Faggiano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dario Giuffrida in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kris Henau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Toni Ibrahim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Riccardo Marconcini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Massironi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maja Primic Žakelj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesca Spada in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Salvatore Tafuto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizabeth Van Eycken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Maaten Van der Zwan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tina Žagar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luca Giacomelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosalba Miceli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by NEPscore Working Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
derived a covariate scoring system based on the 10-year OS predicted by the final Cox model. Then, a three-level prognostic score was derived for classifying patients according to their predicted 10-year OS: (i) favorable risk group: OS ≥70%; (ii
Search for other papers by Brian Hung-Hin Lang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chung-Yau Lo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wai-Fan Chan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by King-Yin Lam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Koon-Yat Wan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
date of diagnosis: 1957–1972 and 1973–1988. A Cox model analysis using a stepwise variable selection led to a prognostic model derived from the former cohort. The prognostic scoring system was validated with the latter cohort. Under this system, a
Search for other papers by Arja Jukkola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Risto Bloigu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tapani Ebeling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pasi Salmela in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guillermo Blanco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
mortality rate for each at 20 years of follow-up. When our population was assessed according to these variables and the scoring system used to create the MACIS staging classification, four risk groups emerged: a low-risk group (score 0–6.9) with a survival