Search Results
Search for other papers by Yoko Katsuki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Minoru Takata in
Google Scholar
PubMed
to be ‘caretakers’, and they function in homologous recombination (HR) repair, thereby protecting our genome from carcinogenic alterations. Furthermore, cancer genome sequences have revealed an unexpectedly high frequency of HR gene mutations in
Search for other papers by Olga Lakiza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julian Lutze in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alyx Vogle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jelani Williams in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Abde Abukdheir in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul Miller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chih-Yi ‘Andy’ Liao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sean P Pitroda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos Martinez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Olivas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Namrata Setia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for other papers by Stephen J Kron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for other papers by Ralph R Weichselbaum in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xavier M Keutgen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
( Lord & Ashworth 2017 ). Here, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are selectively toxic to cells with homologous recombination (HR) DSB repair defects. In breast cancer, tumors with mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 display synthetic lethality with
Search for other papers by Diana Lim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
Search for other papers by Joanne Ngeow in
Google Scholar
PubMed
recruitment of patients for some of these trials has been based on molecular and phenotypic evidence of defects in DNA repair, in particular homologous recombination (HR) repair, such as those with germ line BRCA mutations, or included tumor types known to
Search for other papers by Amélie Fradet-Turcotte in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justine Sitz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Damien Grapton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Search for other papers by Alexandre Orthwein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
genome integrity. In that regard, BRCA2 plays an essential role in several DNA repair pathways, including DSB repair by homologous recombination (HR) and DNA crosslink repair by the FA pathway. The BRCA2 gene was identified in 1995 ( Wooster et al
Search for other papers by Nely Díaz-Mejía in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David García-Illescas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rafael Morales-Barrera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cristina Suarez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jacques Planas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xavier Maldonado in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joan Carles in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joaquin Mateo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-strand break repair genes are common in prostate cancer, and their prevalence increases in advanced disease states. These mutations would lead to a relative impairment of error-free homologous recombination-mediated repair, so the cell will preferentially rely
Search for other papers by Bo Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guochun Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guangnan Wei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Search for other papers by Yulei Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Search for other papers by Liping Guo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Search for other papers by Jiali Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kai Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hsiaopei Mok in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Li Cao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chongyang Ren in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lingzhu Wen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Minghan Jia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cheukfai Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ting Hou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Han Han-Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jing Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charles M Balch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ning Liao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
pathways that are distinct between the two groups. Our results demonstrate that the major signaling pathways affected in HR+/HER2+ tumors were homologous recombination ( Fig. 2A , 37.5% vs 11.6%, P = 0.004), TGF-beta ( Fig. 2B , 35.9% vs 11.6%, P = 0
Search for other papers by Louis de Mestier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean-Baptiste Danset in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cindy Neuzillet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vinciane Rebours in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jérôme Cros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nadem Soufir in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pascal Hammel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
radicals generated by the cellular metabolism, ultraviolet light, radiation and chemicals. Homologous recombination (HR) is a high-fidelity repair system of double-strand DNA breaks and DNA cross-linking damages induced by DNA-damaging agents. The BRCA1 and
Search for other papers by Cathy B Moelans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joep de Ligt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Petra van der Groep in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pjotr Prins in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Nicolle J M Besselink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marlous Hoogstraat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalie D ter Hoeve in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miangela M Lacle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Robert Kornegoor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carmen C van der Pol in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wendy W J de Leng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ellis Barbé in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bert van der Vegt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John Martens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Bult in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vincent T H B M Smit in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Marco J Koudijs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Isaac J Nijman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Emile E Voest in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pier Selenica in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Britta Weigelt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jorge S Reis-Filho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elsken van der Wall in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cancer Genomics.nl, Center for Molecular Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Edwin Cuppen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul J van Diest in
Google Scholar
PubMed
and/or TCGA. Mutational signature analysis revealed that 24% of MBCs have a dominant signature 3 associated with defective homologous recombination DNA repair, whereas only 13% of TCGA FBCs demonstrated a dominant signature 3 ( Fig. 3 ). In
Search for other papers by F J DeMayo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J P Lydon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O M Conneely in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B W O'Malley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The ability to modify the genome by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells has proven to be a powerful tool in evaluating the role specific genes play in normal development and during the progression of specific diseases. This technology has already provided valuable information in understanding the roles of specific genes in the development of the mammary gland and the interaction of specific genes in the development of mammary cancer. This paper discusses some of the current findings that knockout technology has made with regards to mammary development and discusses some of the limitations of this technology.
Endocrine-Related Cancer (1997) 4 85-92
Search for other papers by Deborah J Marsh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
been shown to have critical cellular functions. An example of this is monoubiquitination of the Fanconi Anemia protein FANCD2 in response to DNA damage that promotes homologous recombination repair of DNA double strand breaks ( Nakanishi et al . 2005