Search Results
Search for other papers by Charles E Massie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Inmaculada Spiteri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Helen Ross-Adams in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hayley Luxton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jonathan Kay in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hayley C Whitaker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mark J Dunning in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Department of Biological Sciences and School of Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Departments of Pathology, Urology, Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Department of Biological Sciences and School of Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Departments of Pathology, Urology, Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
Search for other papers by Alastair D Lamb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio Ramos-Montoya in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniel S Brewer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Department of Biological Sciences and School of Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Departments of Pathology, Urology, Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
Search for other papers by Colin S Cooper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Department of Biological Sciences and School of Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Departments of Pathology, Urology, Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
Search for other papers by Rosalind Eeles in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by UK Prostate ICGC Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Y Warren in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simon Tavaré in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Department of Biological Sciences and School of Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Departments of Pathology, Urology, Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Department of Biological Sciences and School of Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Departments of Pathology, Urology, Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
Search for other papers by David E Neal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andy G Lynch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
identification and quantification of epigenetic alterations and are therefore a tractable second line of enquiry to identify driver events in prostate tumourigenesis. We have recently identified a role for the enhancer of split transcription factor HES6 in
Search for other papers by H E Turner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N R Moore in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J V Byrne in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J A H Wass in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction
The use of increasingly sophisticated imaging techniques has produced a new clinical problem: namely the evaluation and management of the serendipitously discovered mass-‘incidentaloma’. In the last 50 years of endocrinology, these lesions have been described mainly in the adrenal and pituitary glands by pathologists on the basis of autopsy series of patients assumed to have been asymptomatic. The current challenge is the investigation of these common lesions which are now more commonly detected during life, to allow not only the correct identification and investigation of those with a hypersecretory syndrome whether it be clinically apparent or subclinical, but also the correct identification of those masses which are malignant and which may therefore produce significant problems in the future. As more experience is gained on the natural history of the true incidentaloma, appropriate follow-up and treatment can be instigated as necessary. The rationale of investigations therefore should be to evaluate most accurately and cost-effectively which patients do not have an incidentaloma, but a lesion that requires further active treatment.
Search for other papers by Sisi He in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liqian Ma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amy E Baek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna Vardanyan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Varsha Vembar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joy J Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Adam T Nelson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
Search for other papers by Joanna E Burdette in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
University of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, Anticancer Discovery from Pets to People Theme, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
Search for other papers by Erik R Nelson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Mantel–Cox or Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon test are as indicated in the figure. Materials and methods Survival analysis Kaplan–Meier plots were graphed using Graphpad Prism 6 with data and statistical analysis from Kaplan–Meier plotter
Search for other papers by James Yao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Abhishek Garg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jaume Capdevila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul Engstrom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rodney Pommier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Van Cutsem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simron Singh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Fazio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wei He in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Riester in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Parul Patel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maurizio Voi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Morrissey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianne Pavel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthew Helmut Kulke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
pancreas (6%) ( Yao et al. 2008 ). The prognosis and treatment of patients with NET are currently based on the traditional criteria, including tumor grade, anatomic site of origin and tumor stage ( Falconi & Partelli 2017 ). While these criteria are
Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Mehtap Derya Aydemirli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jaap D H van Eendenburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tom van Wezel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Oosting in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Willem E Corver in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ellen Kapiteijn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hans Morreau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
foci also decreased in maximum diameter (from 9 to 6 mm, and 10 mm to indiscernible, respectively), while one focus showed growth (from 8 to 12 mm). No toxicity was reported with lorlatinib. The patient is currently alive, he has been scheduled for
Search for other papers by V Craig Jordan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
story unfolds after hearing tales about ‘the War’ and my ‘DNA Dad’. My mother met ‘DNA Dad’ before D-Day June 6, 1944. He returned from the momentous landing 4 months later and they married. He returned to his unit and was present at the Battle of the
Search for other papers by Guo-Qiang Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chuang Xi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chen-Tian Shen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hong-Jun Song in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Quan-Yong Luo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhong-Ling Qiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, studies are needed to determine which factors in the tumor microenvironment regulate NIS expression and further propose potential strategies to induce thyroid cancer redifferentiation to restore sensitivity to RIT. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) participates in
Search for other papers by Marc Lippman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
so much of my career path almost obvious and unavoidable in retrospect. I owe a great deal to my father. He was a remarkably gifted man. Some might say a polymath. He was a fine physician, a scholar, a renowned collector of African tribal art, a
Search for other papers by Paraskevi Xekouki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Spyridon A Mastroyiannis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dimitrios Avgeropoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria de la Luz Sierra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giampaolo Trivellin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Evgenia A Gourgari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charalampos Lyssikatos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martha Quezado in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicholas Patronas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christina Kanaka-Gantenbein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George P Chrousos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Constantine A Stratakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
initial presentation, his height was 186.6 cm ( z -score +4.72), over the calculated mid-parental height (180.5±4.5 cm), and his weight was 78.7 kg ( z -score +2.59). He was also macrocephalic and he had several facial characteristics typical of gigantism
Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Günter Klöppel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
first described in the rabbit by the German medical student Paul Langerhans (1847–1888) in his doctoral thesis in 1869 ( Langerhans 1869 , Kloppe 1969 , Hausen 1987 a , Baskin 2015 ). He worked in the laboratory of the eminent Berlin pathologist